1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
14

A result of US foreign aid in Sudan was

Social Studies
2 answers:
larisa [96]3 years ago
7 0

<span>The creation of South Sudan was a result of US foreign aid in Sudan.

To add, </span>South Sudan, officially the Republic of South Sudan, is a landlocked country in northeastern Africa that gained its independence from Sudan in 2011 and its current capital is Juba.

TiliK225 [7]3 years ago
3 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

Result of US foreign aid in Sudan was the creation of South Sudan.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

South Sudan, officially the Republic of South Sudan, is a landlocked country in northeastern Africa that gained its independence from Sudan in 2011.

In addition to moral reasons, there are economic ways in which the U.S. benefits from foreign aid to South Sudan. Studies have shown that the U.S. is one of the highest donors to South Sudan, donating $887.5 million in 2017.

Another way in which the U.S. benefits from foreign aid to South Sudan is through security.

You might be interested in
This religious group founded in geneva, switzerland is often highlighted by their belief in predestination, or the belief that g
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Calvanism.

Explanation:

Please try to include the answers, this was much harder to figure out without them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvinism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Calvinism

8 0
3 years ago
Pls answer How does the description of the government's intervention in the Great Depression contribute to the development of id
V125BC [204]

Answer:

The Great Depression was caused by government intervention, above all a financial system controlled by America’s central bank, the Federal Reserve — & the interventionist policies of Hoover & FDR only made things worse.

The precise causes of the Great Depression remain a subject of debate, although, as economist Richard Timberlake observed n 2005, “Virtually all present-day economists... deny that a capitalist free-market economy n any way caused” it.

At the time, however, the free market was blamed, with much of the ire directed at bankers & speculators. Financiers were seen as having wrecked the economy through reckless speculation. President Hoover came to be viewed as a laissez-faire ideologue who did nothing while the economy fell deeper & deeper into depression, & Franklin D. Roosevelt’s interventionist policies under the New Deal were credited with rescuing us from disaster.

Americans came to conclude that the basic problem was the free market & the solution was government oversight & restraint of financiers & financial markets. It’s a view that the public, unaware of the consensus of modern economists, continues to embrace.

But the conventional story ignores the elephant n the room: the Federal Reserve. To place the blame for the Great Depression on a free financial system is like placing the blame for the fall of Rome on credit default swaps: you can’t fault something that didn’t exist. & by the time of the Great Depression, America’s financial system was controlled by the Fed.

It’s hard to overstate the importance of this fact. The Federal Reserve isn’t just any old government agency controlling any old industry. It controls the supply of money, & money plays a role n every economic transaction n the economy. If the government takes over the shoe industry, we might end up with nothing but Uggs & Crocs. But when the government messes with money, it can mess up the entire economy.

The two deadly monetary foes are inflation & deflation. We tend to think of inflation as generally rising prices & deflation as generally falling prices. But not all price inflation or price deflation is malignant — & not all price stability is benign. What matters is the relationship between the supply of money & the demand for money — between people’s desire to hold cash balances & the availability of cash.

Economic problems emerge when the supply of money does not match the demand for money, i.e., when there is what economists call monetary disequilibrium. Inflation, on this approach, refers to a situation where the supply of money is greater than the public’s demand to hold money balances at the current price level. Deflation refers to a situation where the supply of money is less than necessary to meet the public’s demand to hold money balances at the current price level.

N a free banking system, as George Selgin has argued, market forces work to keep inflation & deflation in check, i.e., there is a tendency toward monetary equilibrium. Not so when the government controls the money supply. Like all attempts at central planning, centrally planning an economy’s monetary system has to fail: a central bank has neither the knowledge nor the incentive to match the supply & demand for money. & so what we find when the government meddles n money are periods where the government creates far too much money (leading to price inflation or artificial booms & busts) or far too little money (leading to deflationary contractions).

& it turns out there are strong reasons to think that the Great Depression was mainly the result of the Federal Reserve making both mistakes.

The goal here is not to give a definitive, blow-by-blow account of the Depression. It’s to see in broad strokes the way in which government regulation was the sine qua non of the Depression. The free market didn’t fail: government intervention failed. The Great Depression doesn’t prove that the financial system needs regulation to ensure its stability — instead it reveals just how unstable the financial system can become when the government intervenes.

7 0
2 years ago
(Non-Collaboration): Robert Sobukwe introduced the principle of "non-collaboration" for African people in a liberation struggle,
exis [7]

The concept of Non-Collaboration refers to the certainty that only black people can argue and fight for freedom, since they are the oppressed people and since white people are part of a group of oppressors. This concept is important in relation to overcoming certain forms of oppression, because it allows people who are oppressed by the racist system to have the authority to speak and show what is really harmful and maleficent, since they go through it and have priority in the subject they live and know. In other words, the importance of Non-Collaboration is to give voice to the oppressed, without being interrupted by the oppressor.

The "non-racialist" philosophies of Ubuntun and African socialism do not agree with this concept. This is because both maintain the idea that states that “my existence is connected to the existence of the other”, which means, for them that the anti-racist and freedom debate of black people needs the participation of white people, since they are part of of the oppressive racist system. In short, for Ubuntun and African Socialism both the oppressed and the oppressor need to participate in the process of liberating blacks.

I agree with the principle of Non-Collaboration in parts. I believe that when it comes to talking about racism, black people have priority as they are the people who suffer from it. In this case, I believe that whites have no place to speak and should be silent, listen and understand. However, I believe that racism will only be fought with the participation of whites, since they were the ones who created this system and they are the people who maintain it today, so I think it is important that whites also participate in this debate; as a listener and not as a speaker.

8 0
3 years ago
Which political viewpoint claims that there must be fundamental change in economic, political, and family institutions in order
harkovskaia [24]
Whats the options for this question?
8 0
3 years ago
Declining Muslim empire in Middle East
shutvik [7]
Http://study.com/academy/lesson/decline-of-the-muslim-empires-ottomans-safavids-mughals.html  copy and paste this link.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the leader of the communist party during the long march
    5·2 answers
  • The ________ , present in infants, is an example of a built-in, unlearned fear.
    14·1 answer
  • Write a scene from a play in which colonists in a small town react to the news of the Battle of Lexington. Remember, not all col
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following leaders is an example of an autocratic leader?
    16·2 answers
  • In contrast to the American Indians, European colonies viewed land and natural resources as sacred gifts that should not be dist
    15·2 answers
  • ¿que tipo de conducta regulan los valores eticos?
    13·1 answer
  • How does migration result in cultural diffusion?​
    14·1 answer
  • Why is the St. Lawrence Seaway important?
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Identify the physiological responses of experimental rats after they were exposed to a variety of stressors in Hans Selye's stud
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!