Answer:
construals
Explanation:
A construal is a specific interpretation that each person could have toward a certain circumstance or idea which can be completely different from one to another. In this case, Karen's construal on the situation is completely the opposite in regards to their parents. Socially, this variation of interpretation may cause every kind of reaction as a result of a social event.
Answer:
It's Is The Second One
Explanation:
I Just Did It I Hope This Helps You
Have A Wonderful Day
Answer: If you are asked a difficult or complex question, avoid the temptation to:
e. clarify
Explanation: Since the question is difficult and complex, it is possible to have an idea about the question but it would be wise to avoid clarifying it. Because it would be then you would be forced to say something incorrect.
I also agree this is a D. conspiracy.
These two individuals have conspired to commit a crime, but they haven't done it yet. Homicide is murder; solicitation has to do with prostitution; attempt is also wrong because they haven't attempted the crime yet; trespassing is also wrong because they haven't trespassed another person's property yet, which leaves us only with conspiracy.
Answer:
C). Intention of the parties.
Explanation:
As per the question, the most dominant rule would include the 'intention of the parties' that would assist in determining if an object has turned a fixture or not. An item is usually attached to a <u>property only with the permission/intention of the party and their agreement to make it permanent as then only it is considered as a fixture.</u> The other options would play a subservient role in converting a personal property into a fixture while the intent plays the primary role. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
