1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa [10]
3 years ago
9

Political boundaries can change due to peaceful agreements between nations. Using complete sentences, explain two reasons why on

e nation might peacefully agree to hand over part of its territory to another.
Social Studies
2 answers:
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Gemiola [76]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Several peaceful political actions can change a country’s territorial boundaries. For example, a country may need money to pay off a debt or to buy needed supplies. That country can choose to sell a portion of its land in exchange for money. A country might also change its boundaries if it exchanges territory with a neighbor. One country might make an agreement with another country to give up territory after a war. After many years, that land may be returned to its original owner. Finally, a country might change its boundaries to avoid a war. A country may choose to give up a piece of land rather than to fight a war against a neighbor.

<h3>This is the answer that ed gives you</h3>

You might be interested in
How did the highland scots help serve the “buffer colony ” known as Georgia
snow_tiger [21]
The Scots We are among the finest soldiers in the world and had been recruited by General James Oglethorpe to provide a buffer between the English colony and the Spanish in Florida. The Scots Built a fort to replace Fort King George at the mouth of the Altamaha river, which had been abandoned in 1732.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following does not describe the judicial branch?
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

D.) Once the Supreme Court determines a law to be unconstitutional, there is no way for it to be passed.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition, and redressal ) act ,2013 covers any female who is
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

I hope it's D, cause if not yeesh.

Explanation:

Women are to be respected, jeesum what a question. Hope this helped!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: Should Mrs. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test? Whi
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

Using the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: should Mis. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test the best option to fill the blank pace is: Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach the material.

Explanation:

First of all, let's analyze the context and the answers.

In this case, let's consider the first option. It doesn't matter if the students obtain better results if she instead applied a closed-book test. Increasing the notes the students would obtain wouldn't mean they learned the correct answer. But that they know how to find information. So it is the most logical considering the cost-benefit analysis.

The second option says that Mrs. Baxter wouldn't need to proctor the exam. But just because it is an open book test doesn't mean students won't feel insecure about their answers and won't copy from classmates, so it's wrong.

Parents may be happier with grades. This could be a good choice but may is such an ambiguous answer that doesn't say anything. It is a tricky answer we have a 50% chance they would be happier with nice grades, but if asked her the reason they wouldn't be happy. So, it's wrong because, in the end, she didn't test their knowledge.

Fourth option Parents will encourage children to study. They could provide them reinforcement for good performance but not encourage them. They would encourage them if they performed badly. Also if they knew how they obtained it, they would definitely know they were not tested and would have a reason to be rewarded. So it is also wrong.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jorge is a pitcher for his high school baseball team. In the last inning, he gave up a home run, which turned out to be the go-a
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

Frustration-Agression Principle.

Explanation:

The Frustration-Agression principle can be understood as the theory that states that the subjective feeling of frustration often leads to individuals exhibiting aggresive behaviors.

Frustration is a feeling of irritation and potent annoyance when an external (or sometimes internal) event prevents the individual from achieving a certain goal.

Aggresion is a malicious act directed to another person or object.

In this particular case, Jorge is a pitcher that in the last inning gave up a home run. He then experienced frustration and afterwards he hit a batter with a fast ball (Agressive behavior).

Jorge's behavior illustrates: The Frustration-Agression principle.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why concerned citizens vote regularly
    9·2 answers
  • The power of population is infinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man. Population, when unche
    14·1 answer
  • Amy is 30 years old and she has difficulty forming meaningful relationships with others. according to erikson, she is most likel
    5·1 answer
  • An (n)________________is an intense tropical storm with winds exceeding 119km per hour
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST REPORTING LINKS AND SPAM
    11·1 answer
  • What reforms did theodora institute in Byzantine
    12·1 answer
  • What is mountain<br>please answer me​
    12·1 answer
  • Someone pls help!! Why is Islam such a misunderstood religion?
    13·2 answers
  • In the 1800s, unmarried women in America had
    14·1 answer
  • Please help!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!