1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
3 years ago
13

How were quakers involved in the development of the colonies

History
1 answer:
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: (late) but Quakers were people, who practice pacifism, played a key role in both the abolitionist and women's rights movements. Thus, changing what people's views with arguably radical ideas

You might be interested in
Abraham proposed which of the following ideas to the people of Ur?
svetoff [14.1K]
D is the answer to the questions
5 0
2 years ago
. What is the Supremacy Clause? How does this prevent conflicts between the federal government and the state governments?
Tcecarenko [31]
The Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Clause two) declares that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land". It establishes that federal laws rule over state laws. This ensures that there will be no disagreement between the state and the national government over who has more authority. Federalism is a system of government where the power is shared between the state and national government, but this does not mean that they are equal. The national government will be "supreme".
5 0
2 years ago
How did Rome's expansion after the Punic Wars affect Rome's social development?
OverLord2011 [107]

<em>Answer:</em>

D. The social order changed.

Rome suffered changes due to the wars against Carthage. The Senate had picked up in power and renown in respect to the general population's congregations, the Comitia Plebis.

The Romans rose up out of the Punic wars with the across the board understanding that the most important authority over the military lay with the Senate, that it was the Senate's business to know, exhort and control, and the Senate's business to choose the subject of war or harmony and other outside approach matters.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help :( i dont know this
wolverine [178]

Answer:  In august of that year  the U.S dropped the uranium  bomb on the cities of hiroshima and nagasaki 126,000 civilians died . japan surrendered on august 15 1945

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • HELP PLEASE 15 POINTS How did Massachusetts`s tax policy affect farmers?
    9·2 answers
  • In the late 1800s factories were being powered mostly by what?
    9·1 answer
  • 1.<br> How did World War II impact the federal government of the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • How were urban environments in Britain and Western Europe affected by industrialization?
    8·1 answer
  • How should we remember the Holocaust? Write a small paragraph describing what should be seen as acceptable when talking about th
    14·1 answer
  • Who was an astonomer during the renaissance?
    12·2 answers
  • How was Richard Nixon involved in the cold war?
    7·1 answer
  • As a result of the Spanish-America war, the U.S. gained the territory of Paraguay True or False
    11·2 answers
  • What is the purpose and importance of the constitution
    11·1 answer
  • When was the last time the republicans controlled the house senate and presidency?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!