Answer:
A) $83
Explanation:
First, find aftertax OCF per year
aftertax OCF = (Operating benefit - depreciation)*(1-tax) +depreciation
Depreciation per year = 10,000/5 = 2,000
Tax = 34%
aftertax OCF per year = (3,000 - 2,000)*(1-0.34) + 2,000
= 660 +2,000
= 2,660
Next, find the PV of the aftertax OCF per year. It is an annuity;
PMT = 2,660
N = 5
I/Y = 10%
FV = 0
then CPT PV = 10,083.493
Subtract the initial cost of the machine to find the Net Present Value (NPV);
NPV = -$10,000 + $10,083.493
NPV = $83.493
Answer:
huh?no one's got time to write an essay for you
Answer:
The answer is explained below
Explanation:
The companies board of directors as well as you would consider whether it is best to install the scubber system. When determining whether to install the scubber system both short and long term consequences are to be considered. If presently, the level of pollution is legal, you need to consider if in the future it would be legal? if the installation of the scubber system would affect the public relations of the company. After considering all this, it would be better to install because the pollution can lead to death, and the neighborhood can sue the company. Also the EPA regulations can be regulated.
Answer:
The statement states least regarding the brand equity concept is option A
Explanation:
Brand equity is the value or value premium which a firm generates or create for the product with a name that is recognizable when compared to the generic equivalent. It is used by companies for creating a brand for their products by making them superior in reliability and quality.
So, the one which state least regarding the same that it provide information for assessing the maximizing of the supply chain.
Answer:tortious interference
Explanation:
tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.
