Both y and x is the correct answer
Answer:
Conditional Fee Estate
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question the term being described in the question is called a Conditional Fee Estate. This is (like mentioned in the question) similar to a fee simple except the property must eventually be passed on to the heirs. Which is why it is named as Conditional, because failure to do so will eventually cause the termination of the interest.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: C) eliminating the effects of income statement transactions that did not result in a corresponding increase or decrease in cash
Explanation:
The income statement comprises of entries that are not cash based in nature but help in the computation of taxes amongst other things such as depreciation and amortization.
When calculating net cash provided from operating activities therefore the income calculated should be adjusted for any expenses or revenue that are not cash based in nature and so will not result in a corresponding increase or decrease in cash.
For instance, adding back depreciation and amortization to the net cash balance as both do not actually reduce the cash balance of the company.
Answer:
The financial crisis that began in the 1980s was the result of lax government regulations and management fraud that led to the closure of more than 1,000 savings and loans. The 2007 crisis was the result of risky mortgage loans and investments connected with those loans. In each case the situation resulted in borrowers’ inability to pay back loans and caused many to lose their homes due to foreclosure.
Explanation: Took the practice test on edge and this was the sample response. ^-^
Answer:
The Pandemic has made chicken more expensive, in order to offset this effect to consumers, government subsidized the price of chickens by a per-unit subsidy. If it wants to study the substitution effect of this subsidy, the government should imposed a Lump-sum tax.
False
Explanation:
The government should have imposed a lump-sum subsidy if it really wanted to study the substitution effect of the subsidy instead of imposing a lump-sum tax. This subsidy should be granted to chicken farmers to reduce their production costs, which will in turn reduce the cost of chicken to the consumers. A lump-sum tax sounds like a contradictory effort to offset the high cost of chicken on the consumers.
