No, it might change their body chemistry or even mess with the DNA because of unusual chemicals in food.
Hope This Helps :)
Historically, religious organizations have been against women's rights believing in the traditional approach to families. As times changed, they started lobbying for things such as abortion bans, but there are still countries where things like murder are supported in case of cheating, or similar monstrosities because a woman is considered to be a man's ownership. These places are now much more rare than throughout history, but it still happens.
<span />
This is a question of morals and ethics, and the answer will depend on your own personal, subjective opinions.
On one hand, some people would say that we should experiment as much as we can - going to such lengths where the modification through genetic engineering will allow us to create new humans based on our wants and needs. We will be able to choose our baby's eye color, hair color, everything we might want to do will be possible, and for some people, that is a welcome future.
However, on the other hand, there is also a large number of people who are against such modifications, primarily because it is immoral and 'against God.' In their opinion, we are playing God, doing what we were not supposed to do, and therefore will have to pay the price.
It all depends on how you look at the subject - it is quite personal.
The rhetorical appeal that the speaker used was pathos because he caters to readers’ emotions. That is option B.
<h3>What is rhetorical appeal?</h3>
Rhetorical appeal is defined as the method of persuasion that was formulated by Greek philosopher Aristotle.
It is made up of three modes which include:
Pathos is the rhetorical appeal that is concerned with the empathy and compassion shown towards another.
The rhetorical appeal that the speaker used was pathos because he caters to readers’ emotions.
Learn more about rhetorical appeal here:
brainly.com/question/8353123
#SPJ1
Answer:
The authors prove Feldman's success by describing the size of his business.
Explanation:
At the end of the excerpt, the authors talk of how Feldman threw off the "shackles of cubicle life". <u>He went from being an employee in a cubicle to being a successful self-employed man. To prove his success, the authors provide us with numbers that show the size of his business: </u>
<u><em>Within a few years, Feldman was delivering 8,400 bagels a week to 140 companies and earning as much as he had ever made as a research analyst.</em></u>
<u>Being able to deliver that amount of bagels to that number of companies can only mean his business is big. He'd need to have several people working under him as well as a quite decently sized infrastructure to do it.</u>
