We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:
Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:

Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:

<span>
As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of </span>inverse functions. For that reason <em>we can't agree with Danika</em>.
Answer:
-2 C is cooler cause - in the C makes it cooler (sorry if im bad this is my 1st time)
Step-by-step explanation:
A=pq divided by 2.
I hoped this helped a little
Answer:
A) x = 6 y = 6√3
Step-by-step explanation:
30-60-90 Triangle rule states that the hypothesis is 2x, the short leg is x, and the long leg is x√3. So, the short leg is 12/2 = 6, and the long leg is 6√3.