1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DaniilM [7]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following statements is true regarding the effect that size of the group has on the performance of the group? A. Th

e size of the group does not affect the group's overall behavior. B. Evidence indicates that larger groups are faster at completing tasks than smaller ones. C. Compared to smaller groups, larger groups are better at problem solving. D. If the goal of the group is fact-finding, then smaller groups are more effective than larger groups. E. Evidence indicates that individuals perform better in larger groups than in smaller ones.
Social Studies
1 answer:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is letter C

Clearly articulate your vision and strategy for your employees: You can't expect your employees to understand you without first articulating what you want done. Leaders often assume that they are communicating well, when in reality they are not.

Create a safe environment for dissent: Once you have communicated what you want done, ask for feedback. Encourage debate, so that you don't get defensive, but learn to learn and make your ideas even better.

Take time to ponder your decision: Even if you think you already know the answer, take a day or two to rethink what you want to do. This will let your employees see that you are really pondering the comments and feedbacks they gave you before making a decision. In addition, it will make them feel heard and as part of the team.

Announce your decision and ask people to line up: Once you have considered the comments they have made, announce your decision and ask if people are aligned with what you are saying. Attention to that point! You don't need people to agree with you, but to be in line with your vision. This means that even if people do not agree, they must be willing to accept that this is their final decision, and that they must be willing to do what is necessary for their vision to become a reality.

You might be interested in
Can you leave the hospital without being discharged?
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

well u can but your not supposed to.

its kinda illegal

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
WAY 1. What level of government (local, state, or national) would best suits each category?
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

For Way 1: <em>What level of government (local, state, or national</em>[*]<em>) would best suits each category?</em>

  • Immigration: National.
  • Education: State.
  • Environment: State.
  • Water Rights: Local/State.
  • Homeland Security: National
  • Unemployment: State.
  • Transportation Infrastructure: State/National.

For Way 2: <em>How does each level of govt. affect each policy category? This way may help you organize your thoughts more. </em>

<em />

Most of the issues should be handled by the state. Things like <em>immigration</em> and <em>homeland security</em> should be managed by the Federal Government because they effect the nation as a whole; while <em>water rights</em> should be managed either by the local municipal government or by the state. Things like <em>transportation infrastructure</em> should be maintained by the state, as you do pay taxes to the state government to maintain them. However, interstates are federal roads and should be maintained by either the state they lie in or federal government.

Explanation:

Immigration is a national issue. Immigrants can go wherever in the country they want, and that is why the Federal Government should handle this.

For me, education policies should be left to the states to decide. The Federal Government could set guidelines down as to what needs to be required generally, but otherwise, let that be an issue the states handle.

When it comes to environment, not everyone agrees how to handle this topic. I think it should be up to the states to decide how they are going to handle this issue. It would allow states like Washington and California that are supposedly "sticking up for the environment" to band together without Federal interference and it would allow states like Texas and Idaho to be free to do their own thing without Federal interference. The Federal Government should only step in  there are building cities being built on toxic waste dumps, should there be any toxic waste dumps.

On the topic of water rights, I do not know what you mean. Everyone has the right to clean water. And keeping that water clean and accessible should be handled by the local government. The state should step in if the local government isn't keeping the water clean and accessible.

Homeland security is a national issue that effects the nation as a whole and should be handled by the Federal Government.

Unemployment is a national issue, but I think the states should handle it. Every state (and city for that matter) can set its own minimum wage and local policies that can help businesses decide if they want to hire more or less people. For example,  if the local or state government sets the minimum wage to $20/hour but the business isn't making enough money to pay all of its employees (say it has 20 employees), it will either lay off/fire a number of those employees and avoid hiring more to allow it to pay the minimum wage, cut the time employees are working so they work less time and require less pay, or raise its prices. Of course, a small business likely wouldn't be able to raise its prices and probably can't afford to cut the time its employees are on staff. This means more people will be out of work, and prices will also be higher to pay for the wages for those still in the workforce. Like the environment, people differ on this topic and I think its best to keep the federal government out of this issue to ensure it gets handled the way the locals want it to.

Highways like US. Route 101 should be managed by the state, since they aren't as important to inter-state travel as the auspiciously named interstate system. However, interstates should be maintained by both/either the state or the Federal governments.

I take it the question is from a test, so I would guess you should also consult what the lessons or textbooks say about the topic. The question is worded in such a way that it is asking for your opinion, but I would suggest sticking as close to the course as possible for the sake of not getting a bad grade (or worse grade if you already have a bad grade).

7 0
3 years ago
Steve owns his own house in fee simple. The state wishes to build a much-needed, new highway through the center of his house. St
zzz [600]

Answer: RESERVED EASEMENT.

Explanation: Reserved easement can be defined as the legal right by the person that granted the real property to use the real property of another individual, generally in order to cross a part of the property, or to gain access to something on the property.

In most countries, the original grantors of property is the government.

Like in the example stated above, the government can use Reserved easement Which is perfectly legal to take the land of Steve.

4 0
4 years ago
In 2000 Campbell Soup Company launched an ad campaign that showed prepubescent boys offering soup to prepubescent girls. The gir
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

(D). The ads taught girls to worry about their weights and negatively affected their body images.

Explanation:

The message passed across in Campbell Soup Company's ad, suggested that it was okay for girls to eat foods with low calorie intake but they should avoid high calorie intake foods.

<u>This ad passed across a message to young girls to worry about their weights and how they look physically.</u>

5 0
3 years ago
The Second Continental Congress voted twice on the Declaration of Independence because
algol [13]

Answer:

They wanted a unanimous vote.

Explanation:

It was to include all the other colonies too

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What marked the beginning of the americas
    11·1 answer
  • Certain political and religious leaders rely on charisma and verbal persuasions to influence multitudes of people. Jung would sa
    10·1 answer
  • By 1850, 15 percent of the total U.S. population lived in cities.
    10·1 answer
  • About 20 percent of the U.S. population lives from just above to just below the poverty line. They typically hold unskilled jobs
    11·1 answer
  • The predictability of an association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) facilitates an organ
    15·1 answer
  • "Technician A says that you should always re-inflate a severely underinflated tire using the safety cage. Technician B says that
    12·1 answer
  • Would the patriot have won if the war without help from France and Spain? why or why not?
    7·1 answer
  • Promotions, re-enlistments, and retirements are _______________ ceremonies that recognize milestones in an individual Marine
    5·1 answer
  • To express emotion classical Indian dancers use movements of the eyebrows and eyelids. They also use hand gestures to communicat
    11·2 answers
  • What were king george the thirds views on aboriginal peoples​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!