Immanuel kant claims that the only thing that is moral without qualification is <u>"good will".</u>
Kant depicts a “good will” as the main thing that is moral without qualification. “Good will” is to act with moral thinking, regardless of what the result of the activity. It is constantly planned on great and therefore does not have to meet all requirements to be great, as it is in all examples "great". Joy is accomplished by acquiring an end, and in this way it is of no ethical esteem, where as the “good will” is downright and accordingly moral.
<h2>Although the 1996 welfare reform legislation has produced a number of positive outcomes, there are serious issues facing the 107th Congress as it prepares to reauthorize the legislation by October 1, 2002. This policy brief discusses 13 important issues associated with the legislation and the controversy surrounding each of them. The issues include: funding of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program and whether states will retain the level of funding and flexibility in program design and operation they currently enjoy; the growing concern that some families are worse off as a result of sanctions or time limits, or because they failed to find or retain jobs after leaving welfare; and the concern that too many children are being reared by single mothers. Also at issue for the new Congress is whether there is enough money for child care, if more assistance should be provided to working poor families, and whether more should be done to help mothers qualify for better jobs.</h2>
Answer:
The <u>Northern</u> and <u>Western</u> Hemispheres.
Explanation:
Answer: Diffusion of responsibility
Explanation:
Diffusion of responsibility is defined as tendency of people to behave in less responsible manner in any situation or on-going act due to presence of other people. In such situation, people think that others will take action or responsibility or might have already taken step in that situation .
According to the question, neighbors of the women who was getting killed did see her getting attacked and heard her screams as well but did not take any measure due to diffusion of responsibility. They thought that other people witnessing the attack must have called police as a responsibility.
Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.
