Answer:
the prey of crabs would be positively affected, and the predators of crabs would take a negative effect to the extinction of crabs
Explanation:
small clams, starfish, snails, worms, squid, mussels, shrimp and small fish would all be positively affected if crabs were to go extinct, because all that is listed are part of a crabs diet, for both large and small crabs. the ones which would be negatively affected would be the predators of crabs, such as cobia, eels, striped bass, jellyfish, red drum, American eels, sharks, dogfish, sea rays, and smaller fish. they would take a negative affect to the extinction of crabs because as said before, these are all predators of crabs, so the extinction would remove them from their diet, forcing them to find other sources for food
Getting water, salt, and minerals using villi. That the villi do
not remove from the chyme—such as the fragments of
fruits and vegetables—passes on to the large intestine<span>
</span>
<span>The first electrochemical cell was invented by Alessandro Volta.
</span>
Answer:
Because as distance between genes increase, the probability of one recombination grows, but the probability of two recombinations occuring also increases
Explanation:
If we only score the outcome as yes or no to recombination between two genes, then one recombination is a yes, but two is a no and three is a yes again (and so on).
Sensory receptors is the answer I found
