Answer:
Shows the consequences of being jealous and teach us to avoid bad habits.
It shows how others must be treated.
Explanation:
They were walking through the hall and she fell down on someone sat on them and fell back....
A systematic process<span> is often closely associated with critical thinking. In general the application of a </span>systematic process<span> is regarded as a means of management aimed at reducing the number and severity of mistakes, errors and failures due to either human or technological functions involved.</span>
A good book review will:
- Point out strengths and weaknesses in the book
- Looks at what the author intended to do and whether or not he did it
- Be between 50 and 1,500 words
The following is a guide to writing a book review; but, you need to know that they are just suggestions to think about.
- Write down a summary of essential information, like title, author, copyright date, kind of book, price, subject matter of the book, and special features.
- State the reason the author wrote the book.
- Consider from what point of view the book was written.
- Decide what the author was trying to accomplish.
- Determine what kind of book is it, and who is the intended audience.
- Discuss the author's style of writing and look at his cohesion, clarity, flow of the text, and use of precise words.
- Think about how you were affected by the book and if any of your opinions or feelings change because of it.
- Decide if the book met its goal and whether or not you would recommend it to others and why.
- State the main topic of the book and the author's treatment of it. Also explain the development of the thesis, using quotes or references.
- Discuss the author's descriptions and narration, pointing out whether he explained facts or tried to persuade the readers of the validity of an issue.
- Analyze whether or not the book suited its intended audience and if it was interesting and thorough.
- You may challenge his opinions and explain why you disagree with them. Include any information about the author that would establish his authority or that would be relevant to the review.
Your answer would be B. until and then both show evidence of time. Hope this helps!
