DNA is the correct answer but next time put answer choices so that people can better answer your questions. Thanks!
The reason both of these are valid scientific hypotheses is because A) scientists with different educational backgrounds may put forth different hypotheses to explain the same data.
This approach in science is vital in making progress and has helped to explain many phenomena in the past. When scientists explain data using different approaches, they come to a more comprehensive conclusion.
Analytical balance is your answer
Answer:
B
Explanation:
<em>Respiration </em><em>can </em><em>happen</em><em> </em><em>without</em><em> </em><em>sunlight</em><em>,</em><em>but </em><em>photosynthesis</em><em> </em><em>cannot</em><em>.</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>photosynthesis</em><em> </em><em>doesn't</em><em> </em><em>take</em><em> </em><em>place </em><em>at </em><em>night</em><em>,</em><em>so </em><em>less </em><em>carbon dioxide</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>used </em><em>up </em><em>than </em><em>it </em><em>is </em><em>produced</em><em>.</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>