All categories

3 years ago

The danger in judging someone according to his or her social networking profile is that:

Social Studies

2 answers:

Novay_Z [31]3 years ago

6 0

The profile represents only some aspects of a individual

RSB [31]3 years ago

6 0

The danger in judging someone according to his or her social networking profile is that the profile may not be true.

No person is under any obligation to put only true facts or photos on their social media profiles. It has been proven countless amounts of time that many people deliberately lie on social media in order to impress others. They put false/very old or heavenly filtered pictures of themselves, they conceal their real age and they lie about their martial status or their job.

This is the reason why one should always make sure the person being judged according to their social networking profile really exists in real life.

You might be interested in

Jane is a utility-maximizing consumer who is spending her entire budget on the optimal quantity of wallets and eyeglasses. The p

skad [1K]

Answer:

There is a missing part of the answer in all the options as there are three spaces to fill and only two part of the answers are provided in all the options.

Hence the correct answer would be ---

increase; normal; reinforces

which may be considered as answer option e). normal; reinforces where 'increase' is missing.

Explanation:

The utility-maximizing model is a model theory of a consumer which shows how consumers try to allocate their income money. It is believe that every customer is a rational being and try to get the optimized value for their money spent. Consumers' resources are limited so that their incomes are also limited. Consumers have budget constraint.

According to the Utility Maximization theory, every consumers try to decide to spend their incomes so that the last pie spent on a product yields an amount which is equal to the extra marginal utility.

Thus a utility-maximizing consumer, Jane who is spending his income on wallets and eyeglasses will increase the purchased of wallets, when the price of the wall decreases, if the wallets are considered a normal good and the income effect of Jane will reinforces the substitution effect.

Therefore the answer is ---

increase; normal; reinforces

7 0

3 years ago

20 POINTS!!!How could the five pillars of islam affect the life of a beliver and what are possible consequencesare solutions

Luden [163]

The Five Pillars of Islam, Faith (Shahada),Prayer (Shalah), Charity (Sakat), Fasting (Shawm) and Pilgrimage (Hajj) provide a Muslim practitioner or believer with clear guidelines for leading a life in harmony with good and God and a well-defined way to experience one's religious experience.

The consequence of abiding by the Five Pillars of Islam is perfecting one's soul by steering away from sins and other spiritually unpleasant things. Today, Muslims in the U.S. interpret the term jihad (grossly translated as holy war) as a personal struggle in order to fight off personal defects and vices so that they can become better citizens, parents, persons, etc.

7 0

2 years ago

I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE FIRST

lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

B, C, and D.

Please give brainliest

3 0

3 years ago

In a objective account of an event, a person leaves their personal beliefs out of their report of the event.

Alja [10]

The correct answer would be false for the question. Okay?

3 0

2 years ago

When we symbolize a claim, we're displaying its truth-functional structure. Show that you can figure out the structures of the f

kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

1. (P --> Q) & R

2. P --> (Q & R)

3. (P&Q) --> R

4. P & (Q --> R)

5. P --> (Q --> R)

6. (P --> Q) & (R --> Q)

7. (P v R) --> Q

8. P v (Q --> R)

9. (P v Q) --> R

10. P --> (Q v R)

Explanation:

If Parsons signs the papers then Quincy will go to jail, and Rachel will file an appeal:

(P --> Q) & R

If Parsons signs the papers, then Quincy will go to jail and Rachel will file an appeal:

P --> (Q & R)

If Parsons signs the papers and Quincy goes to jail then Rachel will file an appeal:

(P&Q) --> R

If Parsons signs the papers and if Quincy goes to jail Rachel will file an appeal:

P & (Q --> R)

If Parsons signs the papers then if Quincy goes to jail Rachel will file an appeal:

P --> (Q --> R)

If Parsons signs the papers Quincy goes to jail, and if Rachel files an appeal Quincy goes to jail:

(P --> Q) & (R --> Q)

Quincy goes to jail if either Parsons signs papers or Rachel files an appeal:

(P v R) --> Q

Either Parsons signs the papers or, if Quincy goes to jail, then Rachel will file an appeal:

P v (Q --> R)

If either Parsons signs the papers or Quincy goes to jail then Rachel will file an appeal:

(P v Q) --> R

If Parsons signs the papers then either Quincy will go to jail or Rachel will file an appeal:

P --> (Q v R)

I have added truth table in attachment.

All possible conditions for each statements are in truth table with both true and false cases of P,Q,R.

4 0

2 years ago