Answer:
Lawrence Kohlberg
Explanation:
Lawrence Kohlberg is known for his theory of stages of moral development. He was an American psychologist. The six stages explain the process of how the individuals explain and justify their actions when they are stuck in moral dilemmas. His theory was based on the observations made by Jean Piaget and John Dewey.
It allowed a person's vote to only count for one instead of spread out compared to the votes given if you lived in urban, or rural areas. It also allowed certain people to vote.
Ivan pavlov introduced the concept of CONDITIONING when he taught a dog to salivate at the sound of tuning fork
The same condition happen to human. Our brain response to our exact habitual conditioning that's why sometimes it's very hard to lose/change a habit.
For example, if you condition yourself that you need to hold some sort of doll before you went to sleep, it will be hard for you to sleep if somehow that doll is not in your possession<span />
Northern Georgia is different from Southern Georgia in that it is much hillier and firmly part of the mountainous terrain associates with the Appalachian Mountains. Northern Georgia is often a little cooler than Southern Georgia and can be less humid, depending.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
