In my honest opinion, I think that the Chinese government has no right to block off the rights to social media and possibly the internet. The internet is how we all connect to each other, see friends, learn about the world, basically get smarter and more aware. If the Chinese government takes away the right to the internet, the literacy rate will drastically drop, and business will slow down. China won't be considered a world super-power anymore, and American companies will dominate the industry scene instead of Chinese owned businesses. To close, if there is no social media in China, China will face the consequences.
Answer:
C. national conventions for nominating presidential candidates
Explanation:
The progressives wanted the citizens to have as much influence as possible during the election of the president.
If presidential candidates were chosen by the national conventions, the political parties are the one that will decide which person can run as the presidential candidates. The citizens/voters have no say on it. This will increase the risk that the parties will only appoint nominees that serve the interest of the party, not the citizens.
This is why the progressives favor direct primaries, which enable the citizens to vote for the candidate that should run for the presidential election.
Answer:
Water has been a source of electricity to people
Water has brought development in America.
Answer: The right to privacy
Explanation:
Answer:
Qualifications, good behavior/track record, experience, judicial philosophy, no conflict of interest
Explanation:
The constitution of the United States specifically singles out good behavior as a prerequisite for appointed for the role of judge of the Supreme court(federal level), remaining silent on issues such as qualifications, experience, philosophy, and any potential conflict of interest. According to Article 3, Section 1 of the US constitution, the individual need be of "good behavior" as in acceptable character to be in office.
