Answer:
In the past, learners were required to achieve at least 50% in four specific designated subjects that were the same nationwide. However, this was recently changed - the new requirements include attaining the same percentage in any four subjects that have 20 credits from a list of subjects.
This change has certain advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there will be more students with better percentages applying for various high education institutions as it should now be easier for them to pick subjects they are most confident in and that will be relevant for their further education. Their focus will also be on those most important subjects for them and their studies instead of on something they might not even need in their future career.
However, a disadvantage is that students might pick subjects they find easiest just to secure their place in a university. Those subjects ultimately might not provide them with needed strategies for thinking and learning that otherwise designated subjects might have. Furthermore, some higher education institutions might have their own lists of designated subjects and minimum entry requirements that might not be the same as the student's choices.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Answer:
the embargo act
Explanation:
sailors were a key issue in the u.s during the napolenoic wars so he passed the embargo act to protect american ships with imports
Brooklyn Dodgers general manager Branch Rickey held his famous three-hour meeting with Jackie Robinson. It was the meeting in which Rickey attempted to incite the 26-year-old future Hall of Famer, which he succeeded in doing
<span>When Muhammad (saw) began preaching to Arabic about Allah what did he urge them to </span>practice justice, charity, and peace.
I believe the answer is: the moral duty would take precedence over the legal duty
dominance of moral norms conveys that when a moral norms are in a conflict with non-moral norms, the moral norms would be seen as the one that obtain the supremacy between the two. Usually, violating non-moral norms to fulfil a moral norms would make the punishment for the violation become void.