The other person who answered this is wrong btw
Answer:
a)Q=71.4 μ C
b)ΔV' = 10.2 V
Explanation:
Given that
C ₁= 8.7 μF
C₂ = 8.2 μF
C₃ = 4.1 μF
The potential difference of the battery, ΔV= 34 V
When connected in series
1/C = 1/C ₁ + 1/C₂ + 1/C₃
1/ C= 1/8.4 +1 / 8.4 + 1/4.2
C=2.1 μF
As we know that when capacitor are connected in series then they have same charge,Q
Q= C ΔV
Q= 2.1 x 34 μ C
Q=71.4 μ C
b)
As we know that when capacitor are connected in parallel then they have same voltage difference.
Q'= C' ΔV'
C'= C ₁+C₂+C₃ (For parallel connection)
C'= 8.4 + 8.4 + 4.2 μF
C'=21 μF
Q'= C' ΔV'
Q'=3 Q
3 x 71.4= 21 ΔV'
ΔV' = 10.2 V
The formula is F = ( q1 * q2 ) / r ^ 2
<span>where: q is the individual charges of each ion </span>
<span>r is the distance between the nuclei </span>
<span>The formula is not important but to explain the relationship between the atoms in the compounds and their lattice energy. </span>
<span>From the formula we can first conclude that compounds of ions with greater charges will have a greater lattice energy. This is a direct relationship. </span>
<span>For example, the compounds BaO and SrO, whose ions' charges are ( + 2 ) and ( - 2 ) respectively for each, will have greater lattice energies that the compounds NaF and KCl, whose ions' charges are ( + 1 ) and ( - 1 ) respectively for each. </span>
<span>So Far: ( BaO and SrO ) > ( NaF and KCl ) </span>
<span>The second part required you find the relative distance between the atoms of the compounds. Really, the lattice energy is stronger with smaller atoms, an indirect relationship. </span>
<span>For example, in NaF the ions are smaller than the ions in KCl so it has a greater lattice energy. Because Sr is smaller than Ba, SrO has a greater lattice energy than BaO. </span>
<span>Therefore: </span>
<span>Answer: SrO > BaO > NaF > KCl </span>
Answer:
1.045 m from 120 kg
Explanation:
m1 = 120 kg
m2 = 420 kg
m = 51 kg
d = 3 m
Let m is placed at a distance y from 120 kg so that the net force on 51 kg is zero.
By use of the gravitational force
Force on m due to m1 is equal to the force on m due to m2.



3 - y = 1.87 y
3 = 2.87 y
y = 1.045 m
Thus, the net force on 51 kg is zero if it is placed at a distance of 1.045 m from 120 kg.
A gentle slope requires less force over a longer distance as compared to steep slope.
Explanation:
Mechanical advantage of a slope is equal to the ratio of length of slope and the height. A steep slope has shorter length as compared to a gentle slope for the same height. Therefore, mechanical advantage of a gentle slope is more than that of a steep slope. Hence, a gentle slope requires less force over a long distance than a steep slope.