I believe that, if there are three brothers and each invested the same exact money to make a total of $33.00, each brother would have invested $11.
Jonathan's was different, as he invested 2/5. 11 divided by 2 is 5.5, in which 5.5*11 would equal 27.50.
The rest was simply their denominator times $11.
Jared had $33 dollars before the investment, and Justin has $44.
Answer:
25%
Step-by-step explanation:
Since there are 24 apples, and 6 are bad, to find the percentage of the bad apples, you do bad apples/total apples
6/24=.25
0.25 is 25%
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
All votes: 10*3+18+22+15*3+20+8=143
143*0.2(20%)=28.6 about 28vote (Scifi)
Scifi, 10 adults, 18 children, which is 20% of the votes.
Answer:
Option A) reject null hypothesis if z is greater than 1.645
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 250
p = 30% = 0.3
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 75
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Rejection Region:

So, the rejection region will be

That is we will reject the null hypothesis if the calculated z-statistic is greater than 1.645
Option A) reject null hypothesis if z is greater than 1.645
First, you know that Jackson (let call her J) scored 41 more points than L (Leslie). What we don't know is how many points L scored so we can use a variable that will be 'x'.
So the equation will be
J=41+x.
We also know that the total points is 1,189.
To find out what x is we first subtract
1,189-41. We then get 1,148.
We are now left with 2x and 1,148 so we divide
1,148 by 2 and get 574.
574=x so now we can plug that in.
J= 574+41
Jackson scored 615 points and
Leslie scored 574 points
(You can use bar modeling to do solve this problem. An example of bar modeling is shown below.