Based on the Schenck v. United States case, when might it be acceptable for the government to restrict information

1 answer:

8 0

In the case Schenck v. the United States the US Supreme Court ruled that it is acceptable for the government restricts information released by the press when the information is posted as a clear and present danger and may threaten national security for example.

You might be interested in

What was the result of the Scopes "Monkey trial"? Apex

Korolek [52]

The was a fight between science and religion and that created the butler act because they had different beliefes

5 0

3 years ago

How would the creation of a constiution affect louis XVI power

kupik [55]

beacuse it was to much for the power grid at a time

8 0

3 years ago

Resoucess for papers

prohojiy [21]

Explanation:

1. Listing books

2. Listing magazines or journal article

3. Listing website

6 0

4 years ago

In the year 323 B.C., at the age of 33, Alexander died of a fever. By then, he had conquered much of the known world through cru

IRISSAK [1]

The sentence that provides a clue to the meaning of Slaughtered is

"Entire Populations were slaughtered".

Slaughtered means kill or defeat.

Hope This Helps!

7 0

3 years ago

6 How does the United States limit the power of its government? TIME REMAININ 54:01 i. Government officials are subject to the l

BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

Option D

Explanation:

All of the following options are in effect to ensure the government does not have too much power.

Option I:
Government officials are indeed subject to the law, they're not above it nor are they allowed to break the law without facing repercussions.

Option II:
Government officials are held accountable for their actions which is true. Government officials are at risk to be impeached, which is to be removed from their position if they break any laws.

Option III:
Limitations are placed on how long government officials can serve, which is indeed true. Government officials aren't allowed to serve for long periods of time, they're usually allowed to serve for a few years then a new government official is voted into office.

Option IV:
The government is divided into branches which is again true. This is called separations of powers which was put into place to ensure the government doesn't have all the power. So, the government was spilt into three different branches and checks and balances ensures that each branch doesn't gain more power than the other.

Which means your answer is option D "i., il., iii., and iv" or all of the above.

Hope this helps.

4 0

2 years ago