1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
7

An economist was interested in modeling the relation among annual income, level of education, and work experience. The following

data was obtained from a random sample of 12 individuals. Level of education is the number of years of education beyond eighth grade, so 1 represents completing 1 year of high school, 8 means completing 4 years of college, and so on. Work experience is the number of years employed in the current profession. Annual income is measured in thousands of dollars.
Work Experience Level of Education Annual Income ($ Thousands)
21 6 34.7
14 3 17.9
4 8 22.7
16 8 63.1
12 4 33.0
20 4 41.4
25 1 20.7
8 3 14.6
24 12 97.3
28 9 72.1
4 11 49.1
15 4 52.0

A) Construct a correlation matrix between work experience, level of education, and annual income. Is there any reason to be concerened with multicollinearity based on the correlation matrix?

Mathematics
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

A) We use Minitab to solve the question.

The correlation matrix is,

Correlation: Level of Education, Work Experience, Annual Income ($ ,000s)

Work Experience Level of Education

Level of Education -0.042 0.463

Annual Income ($ 0.463 0.756

From correlation matrix there is no any reason to concern multicoinearity.

B)

The Regression Analysis: Annual Income ($ Thousands) vs Work Experience and Level of Education

Analysis of Variance

Source D F Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Regression 2 5577 2788.4 19.96 0.000

Work Experience 1 1675 1674.7 11.99 0.007

Level of Education 1 4114 4114.1 29.44 0.000

Error 9 1257 139.7

Total 11 6834

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

11.8204 81.60% 77.51% 69.81%

Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant -15.2 10.2 -1.49 0.171

Work Experience 1.545 0.446 3.46 0.007 1.00

Level of Education 5.57 1.03 5.43 0.000 1.00

E)

The value of R-sq is 81.60% & R-sq (adj) is 77.51% indicates that adequacy of the fitted model is good.

G & H )

Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value

Constant -15.2 10.2 -1.49 0.171 > 0.05 (significant)

Work Experience 1.545 0.446 3.46 0.007 > 0.05 (significant) ______Reject H0 B1 = 0

Level of Education 5.57 1.03 5.43 0.000 < 0.05 (Not Significant) ______do not Reject H0 B2 = 0

H)

Regression Equation

Annual Income ($ Thousands) = -15.2 + 1.545 Work Experience + 5.57 Level of Education

= -15.2 + 1.545 * 12 + 5.57 * 4

= 25.62

I & J)

Regression Equation

Annual Income ($ Thousands) = -15.2 + 1.545 Work Experience + 5.57 Level of Education

Variable Setting

Work Experience 12

Level of Education 4

Predicted Income is 25.5649 thousands:

Kindly check the attached image below.

Fit SE Fit 95% CI 95% PI

25.5649 4.42545 (15.5538, 35.5759) (-2.98733, 54.1170)

You might be interested in
The length of one side of a triangular lot is 6 m less than 3 times the length of the second side. The third side is 8 m longer
Tanya [424]

second side = x

first side = 3x - 6

third side = (3x - 6) + 8

The perimeter = 80m and is equal x + (3x - 6) + [(3x - 6) + 8]

x + 3x - 6 + 3x - 6 + 8 = 80

7x - 4 = 80 |+4

7x = 84 |:7

x = 12 m

3x - 6 = 3(12) - 6 = 30 m

(3x - 6) + 8 = 3x + 2 = 3(12) + 2 = 38 m

Answer: 12m, 30m, 38m

8 0
3 years ago
Have some free points OwO
hram777 [196]

Answer:

YAY

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the equation for the
natima [27]

Answer: i think its B

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Pls help me pls pls please
dlinn [17]
27 would be the answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A car dealership decreased the price of a certain car by 6%. the original price was $14,600
choli [55]
Well, I am going to assume that your question is asking for the new price of the car after the original price was decreased so here I go...

SOLUTION:

New price = Original price × ( 100% - decrease % )

New price = $14, 600 × ( 100% - 6% )

New price = $ 14, 600 × 94%

New price = $13, 724

Therefore, the answer is:

$13, 724
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For one month, Terry recorded the time at which her school bus arrived. She organized her results in a frequency table. Find the
    5·1 answer
  • The length of a rectangle is 6 yd longer than its width. if the perimeter of the rectangle is 44 yd , find its area.
    8·1 answer
  • What is the equation that represents the line
    5·1 answer
  • The time a projectile spends in the air can be modeled by the equation t² -t - 8 = 0, in which t represents the amount of time t
    11·1 answer
  • What is 'a)' on question 4?
    5·1 answer
  • Determine the slope and y-intercept of the line represented by the linear equation: 1/2y + 2 = 0. Graph the line using the slope
    10·1 answer
  • Rory is playing a video game were each game last 1 3/4 hours he wants to play for nine hours today in this evening how many game
    15·1 answer
  • Im just looking for 25/4 (that's a fraction) divided in 3.
    10·2 answers
  • Expression is equivalent to 6(3n-4)
    11·1 answer
  • Allie found that 40% of the 170 patients she saw in a week were near-sighted
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!