1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
7

An economist was interested in modeling the relation among annual income, level of education, and work experience. The following

data was obtained from a random sample of 12 individuals. Level of education is the number of years of education beyond eighth grade, so 1 represents completing 1 year of high school, 8 means completing 4 years of college, and so on. Work experience is the number of years employed in the current profession. Annual income is measured in thousands of dollars.
Work Experience Level of Education Annual Income ($ Thousands)
21 6 34.7
14 3 17.9
4 8 22.7
16 8 63.1
12 4 33.0
20 4 41.4
25 1 20.7
8 3 14.6
24 12 97.3
28 9 72.1
4 11 49.1
15 4 52.0

A) Construct a correlation matrix between work experience, level of education, and annual income. Is there any reason to be concerened with multicollinearity based on the correlation matrix?

Mathematics
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

A) We use Minitab to solve the question.

The correlation matrix is,

Correlation: Level of Education, Work Experience, Annual Income ($ ,000s)

Work Experience Level of Education

Level of Education -0.042 0.463

Annual Income ($ 0.463 0.756

From correlation matrix there is no any reason to concern multicoinearity.

B)

The Regression Analysis: Annual Income ($ Thousands) vs Work Experience and Level of Education

Analysis of Variance

Source D F Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Regression 2 5577 2788.4 19.96 0.000

Work Experience 1 1675 1674.7 11.99 0.007

Level of Education 1 4114 4114.1 29.44 0.000

Error 9 1257 139.7

Total 11 6834

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

11.8204 81.60% 77.51% 69.81%

Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant -15.2 10.2 -1.49 0.171

Work Experience 1.545 0.446 3.46 0.007 1.00

Level of Education 5.57 1.03 5.43 0.000 1.00

E)

The value of R-sq is 81.60% & R-sq (adj) is 77.51% indicates that adequacy of the fitted model is good.

G & H )

Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value

Constant -15.2 10.2 -1.49 0.171 > 0.05 (significant)

Work Experience 1.545 0.446 3.46 0.007 > 0.05 (significant) ______Reject H0 B1 = 0

Level of Education 5.57 1.03 5.43 0.000 < 0.05 (Not Significant) ______do not Reject H0 B2 = 0

H)

Regression Equation

Annual Income ($ Thousands) = -15.2 + 1.545 Work Experience + 5.57 Level of Education

= -15.2 + 1.545 * 12 + 5.57 * 4

= 25.62

I & J)

Regression Equation

Annual Income ($ Thousands) = -15.2 + 1.545 Work Experience + 5.57 Level of Education

Variable Setting

Work Experience 12

Level of Education 4

Predicted Income is 25.5649 thousands:

Kindly check the attached image below.

Fit SE Fit 95% CI 95% PI

25.5649 4.42545 (15.5538, 35.5759) (-2.98733, 54.1170)

You might be interested in
Can some figure this out
NeX [460]
Hello,

As 4²+(5/2)²=22.25=89/4 (Pytagorean theorem)
Perimeter of the triangle =2*√89 /2 +5 =5+√89
Lateral area: 18*(5+√89)
Total area= 90+18√89+ 4*5/2 *2 =110+18√89 ≈279.811..(ft²)
8 0
3 years ago
What operation would I do to find the average of something?
Lady bird [3.3K]
Sum divided by count. Add up all the numbers and divide it by how many numbers it is.
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the solution to 17 - 2x=-11?<br> 03<br> O-14<br> 14<br> -3
Rudiy27

Answer:

17-2x=-11 ---> 14

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in the "answers"

17-2(14)=-11

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HURRY!!! TIMED!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
fgiga [73]

Answer:

3.

7.608

Step-by-step explanation:

An irrational number is any number which can't be written as a fraction this way. For example, pi and the square root of two cannot be expressed as a fraction of two whole numbers, so they are both irrational.

if we make the respective accounts in the first and second problem we will see that they are irrational numbers

the fourth is a periodic number, which falls within the irrational

the only rational is the third

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Any clues on this please help
AysviL [449]
Im pretty sure points K and F
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The dimensions of a rectangular building are given as a length of 12x + 24 feet and a width of 20x - 10 feet. Write the expressi
    12·1 answer
  • How do I solve this?
    7·1 answer
  • F(x)=(x-6)e^-3x find the interval in which f(x) is increasing, the intervals on which f(x) is decreasing, and the local extrema
    12·1 answer
  • The measures of two supplementary angles are (3x + 9)° and (2x + 2)°. What is the measure of the smaller angle? A. 16.6° B. 69.6
    12·1 answer
  • In a survey conducted by a website, employers were asked if they had ever sent an employee home because they were dressed inappr
    12·1 answer
  • I NEED SMART STUDENT TO HELP ME PLEASE...ILL GIVE POINTS​
    12·1 answer
  • I'm having trouble. Can someone answer?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the solution to the equation 4 + = 6? y = 1 y = 4 y = 500 y = 2000
    8·1 answer
  • HELP I DONT UNDERSTAND MY MATH HOMEWORK AND I HAVE 3 PAGES OF IT
    11·1 answer
  • Cynthia Besch wants to buy a rug for a room that is 24 ft wide and 33 ft long. She
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!