Answer:
the tendency toward a relatively stable equilibrium between interdependent elements, especially as maintained by physiological processes.
Explanation:
The earliest event from these was:
753 BCE: City of Rome founded
Then this happened:
509 BCE: Roman republic founded
Then:
27 BCE: Roman Empire established
After which:
410 CE: Alaric seized Rome
And finally:
476 CE: Odoacer sacked Rome
You can figure out the chronological order by looking if it has either CE or BCE - BCE is before Christ and CE is after Christ. When counting from BCE it goes from higher numbers towards zero. When counting from CE it goes from zero to higher numbers again.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can answer the following.
One of the government's accomplishments under the Articles of Confederation was an arrangement for handling currency to be created.
The problem with the Articles of Confederation (the first form of the Constitution in the United States) was that it left a weak central government that couldn't do much. Indeed, Congress was not able to raise an army or collect money. If Congress needed money, it had to ask from the states, that remained sovereign and could collect money through taxation.
That is why delegates met at the Constitutional Convention in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1787, to create a new Constitution.
Answer:
A strong economy directly benefits me and my family by providing stuff to fit our needs. Such as Water, food, shelter, and sunlight. One could be money and wealth, or two could be food, jobs, or a home. It could be money by providing us with it to buy supplies. Food by, making it and selling it. Jobs so you can provide for you and your family. And lastely, a home, a shelter to live in. These were all ways that a strong, productive economy directly benefits me and my family.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!
Have a great day and good luck!
Brainliest is appreciated!!!
- Lea
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
