Answer: Because the janitor is aware of your plight, the first thing to consider is this being a trick to extort you or to waste your time. After considering it to be a trick, you still have to consider it to be true. This makes it a game of 50:50 chance ( that is equal chance to loss or win).
To approach this situation, you have to define an agreement with the janitor. The agreement should be "send me the chemistry master and I will pay you after I have written the exam to confirm it is actually a chemistry master or pay you 1/10 of your amount if it is not, to compensate your efforts". After sending this agreement, you should focused on your studies like you're not expecting a positive response from him.
Negotiation should not be involved in the agreement, as it will waste your time of studies.
The process wherein it involves the circulation of questionnaires among the group members about a specific problem that they want to tackle is termed as the Delphi Technique. The group members should share the results within the circle then they should continue to recirculate and refine individual responses until a consensus regarding the problem is reached.
Having the direct opposite technique with the nominal group technique or the brainstorming, Delphi technique does not require group members to meet face to face.
These are the steps in taking the Delphi technique. The first step is identifying the problem. Next is, the group members shall then be asked to offer their solutions anonymously. They should answer the carefully designed questionnaires. Third, all the answers of all the members are then compiled and are also sent to all members in the group. After each of the members has already carefully evaluated each of the group member’s answers, they are then asked to generate new individual solutions. Lastly, until a consensus problem solution is arrived, steps 3 and 4 will be done repeatedly.
The advantage of practicing the Delphi technique is they do not have to meet face to face. This is important to those members who are geographically separated or to those who are too busy to meet.
<span>According to Gordon Allport, intergroup contact is likely to reduce prejudice when group members engage in competitive tasks. This theory makes sense, when people have to compete for something in their home life or work life, they tend to think of things being more fair when there is a competition held to achieve the winning. There is so many prejudice in the work environment now-a-days that it is hard to have employees understand why decisions are rightfully made. </span>
