They preformed gratefully under his leadership rights. <span />
Explanation:
Contamination can have undesirable consequences in real experiments, some of them are related to the feelings that may arise in the research participants, the contamination bias reduces the differences between the research groups, and can cause a comparison between the treatments of each different group, the which can generate conflicts and rivalries on the part of groups that consider themselves to be inferior to others. These contamination-related problems can significantly interfere with the research results.
Answer:
#1 = C.
#2 = Try to explain to them what type of problems they could cause towards the people around them and the harm that they will be doing to themselves.
#3 = They can try to tell you how much better it would make you feel or how helpful it could be. Like for example, stimulant drugs can keep you hyped up and more energized to where you can do all kinds of stuff without being exhausted although stimulant drugs do calm down ADHD kids. And there is another category that has all kinds of drugs that keep you more calm and relax but I had forgotten what it's called. This is not the answer to number 3 but maybe this can be helpful for you.
HOPE THIS HELPS!!! :P
Answer: Wouldn't go past High School English and here is why.
Explanation:
English takes a majority in our world today, it will always be spoken, whether 1% of the time or 5%. It has been integrated into our daily lives that even not knowing how to properly speak it is looked down upon. I believes studying English is essentially and will be for centuries to come, but the depth of studying the subject shouldn't go past High School level which incorporates poetic and descriptive inferences through words.
At least that's what I've gotten from it.
"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
