the answer is the third one c
The answer to this is true.
Answer:
I believe the first one would be incomplete dominance, the second would be multiple alleles, and the third would be codominance.
Explanation:
The first one would be incomplete dominance because the child has a blend of the man's straight hair and the woman's curly hair, but neither of two hair types are completely dominant (if that makes sense).
The second one would be multiple alleles because, well, there are multiple alleles listed (more straightforward than the other two).
And the third one would be codominance because the traits of red color and white color are equally dominant.
I’m on that same question
Answer:
The article is not reflecting current knowledge.
Explanation:
Rick Potts had explained some thing which has already been established and published several years back by various scientist, researchers, biologist, ecologists and geologist.
Re publishing something again will not bring laurel to Pott, instead his article would not be considered a suitable article for reference.
Also , if Pott would have published any thing that talks of a way ahead of those previous publication, even then his article could be referred.
