Marbury<span> petitioned the </span>Supreme Court<span> to force the new Secretary of State, James</span>Madison<span>, to deliver the documents. ... The </span>Marbury v<span>. </span>Madison<span> decision expanded the power of the </span>Supreme Court<span> in general, by announcing that the </span>1789 law<span> which gave the </span>Court<span> jurisdiction in this case was -unconstitutional.</span>
Answer: The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.
