Answer:
1, 5, 17, 53, 161
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
First five terms of the sequence:





No, it is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that is obtained when you cube an integer. For example, 8 (cube of 2), 27 (cube of 3) and 64 (cube of 4). Since -3 cannot be obtained by cubing an integer, it is not a perfect cube.
First you add 3/4 and 2/3 you but then do 3/4 2/3 you think what the both can go to is 12 the dominator is 12 then you time it by 3,4 because they both go to 12 then the 3 will be time 3 because 4 x 3 = 12 then you do it the top so 3x3 = 9 9/12 then you do the next one is2/3 do the same then will get 8/12 then you can subtract it 9/12 - 8/12 will gave you 1/12
Answer: Bro write the question better
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is 1.
Step-by-step explanation: