1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
15

Scout first has the idea to make boo come out. a. True b. False

Social Studies
1 answer:
PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago
7 0
Referring to 'to kill a mockingbird'

That statement is False.

The person who <span> first has the idea to make boo come out is Dill, not Scout.
After dill made the attempt to do it, intially Jem and Scout thought that Dill was going to get him killed. But as it turned out, Dill manage to do it by passing him a note with a fishing pole.

</span>
You might be interested in
A defendant was charged with the murder of a victim. During the course of the criminal trial, a witness testified on behalf of t
almond37 [142]

Explanation:

The witness's testimony is inadmissible.

Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.

The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.

These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.

In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.   A victim and his former business.

8 0
3 years ago
Ways to free human trafficking victims​
Nitella [24]

Answer:

There are ways you can help human trafficking victims. There are local clubs or organizations that are focused on helping local police and support of human trafficking victims. You can donate to nonprofits that help human trafficking victims and rescue them.

5 0
3 years ago
Which is a method that scientists use to determine the composition of Earth's layers?
NARA [144]

1, Comparing the composition of the crust to other bodies in the solar system

2. By studying things from Earths layers that have been pushed up through the cracks of the crust.

3.By measuring diffrent kinds of vibration from earthquakes

3.By doing laboratory expirements

        I HOPE THIS HELPS YOUU!!!!!

8 0
4 years ago
What types of expenses should you include when creating a budget? plz hurry
dybincka [34]

Answer: Food expenses, gas, mortgage, pretty much anything that you pay for.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
People tend to make systematic and predictable mistakes in their thinking. These mistakes are called:
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

People tend to make systematic and predictable mistakes in their thinking. These mistakes are called biases.

Explanation:

Humans are not perfect decision makers. Everyday humans make numerous decisions and try their best to be rational. But many times, our cognitive limitations prevent us from doing so. In systematic and predictable ways, we do drift away from perfection. Even if we take each step properly to make a decision by first defining the problem, then thinking of alternatives for the solution and then take a decision, one is bound to get affected by cognitive thinking. Such mistakes that humans make are called biases. They affect the judgement of even a very talented human being.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When conducting scientific research, the _____ of a measure refers to whether it really measures what researchers think it measu
    10·1 answer
  • Everyone choose terai region for settlement .why?
    15·1 answer
  • Industrialists such as john rockefeller used the principles of social darwinism to justify their accumulation of .wealth. social
    5·1 answer
  • _____ maps exclude a lot more than they _____.
    13·1 answer
  • How can in interest group put pressure on Congress and Bureaucrats in order to have their policies enacted?
    7·1 answer
  • Alzuria and Narnia are two open economies that produce goods A and B. The productivity of workers in industry B in Narnia is hig
    6·1 answer
  • List three examples of government actions that promote the free market
    7·2 answers
  • ——Wright is Emmett tills uncle
    5·1 answer
  • Why is school regarded as secondary means of socialization?​
    9·1 answer
  • Discuss two ways which some cultural views that exist may affect a relationship ​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!