Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
The shutdown of the United States government ultimately means that important government work is either not being done, done with resentment, or done by people that are not being paid.
While there are those that think the United States government is too large, a shuddering of the Government ultimately means food that is less safer, environment that is more polluted, and a population that is more in danger.
Answer:
But when the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, it officially repealed the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment states that seats in the House of Representatives were to be determined based on “the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
Explanation:
Massachusetts Anti-Federalists Oppose the Three-Fifths Compromise. The ratification of the United States Constitution was the subject of intense debate between 1787 and 1789.
Jeff's ideas are because of his Percival bias.
Explanation:
Jeff has a predisposition bias against vegans because he associates them with a certain ind of habits that is the tree hugging and many such movements that he obviously has a negative view about.
Thus, even when a person is vegan because they have no other choice but to be one they are still laying the same negative stereotypes on them.
This is the predisposed bias that he transfers onto another person who broadly fits that category in his head.
