Syria, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, United Arad Emirates, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Qatar, State of Palestine, Jordan, Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain, Cyprus.
Answer:
umm so what you need to do is
Explanation:
w8 lemme open my book....
ok yea so
2+2=5
1×1=11
5+11=511
so your answer is 511
Answer:
The ocean would eventually become smaller in size
Explanation:
The earth is covered by about 70% of the water bodies. This water is regulated by maintaining a variety of processes, and this commonly forms a cycle, which is known as the water cycle.
The surface runoff and the flow of groundwater are two of the important processes that add water to the oceans and seas. If these processes are reduced then it will directly affect the oceans. It is because the water will not be contributed to the seas and oceans, thus there will be a reduction in the amount of total water in the oceans. Therefore, it will eventually lead to a reduction in the size of the oceans.
Answer:
Representative democracy
Explanation
Democracy can be divided into two:
- Direct democracy.
In this form of democracy, the citizens can influence the decisions made by the government by directly vote for the type of legislations that the government can pass. This form of democracy typically used in small communities that rarely face overly complicated issues.
- Representatives Democracy.
In this form of democracy, citizens canto vote for the legislations. But, they can select a group of officials in order to vote for the legislations on the citizens' behalf. This system democracy is what currently used the most in the world. Typically, this form of democracy is more efficient in a society with large populations with a lot of complicated issues (such as a country)
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
