The numbers aren't accurate, they dont add up
Answer:
(5x² +7x -26) units²
Step-by-step explanation:

Area of shaded region
= Area of larger rectangle -area of smaller rectangle
Area of larger rectangle
= (3x -4)(2x +2)
= 3x(2x) +3x(2) -4(2x) -4(2) <em>(</em><em>Expand</em><em>)</em>
= 6x² +6x -8x -8
= 6x² -2x -8
Area of smaller rectangle
= (x -6)(x -3)
= x² -3x -6x +18 <em>(</em><em>Expand</em><em>)</em>
= x² -9x +18
Area of shaded region
= 6x² -2x -8 -(x² -9x +18)
= 6x² -2x -8 -x² +9x -18
= 5x² +7x -26
C - no solution
you take the second solution and times the entire equation by -1
then simply
and you get 0x + 0y = 20
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence.
Null hypothesis; H_o ; μ = 445
Alternative hypothesis; H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test which is denoted by H_o. However, the sign of null hypothesis is denoted by the signs of = or ≥ or ≤.
Meanwhile, the alternative hypothesis is one that defers from the null hypothesis. This therefore implies a significant difference in the test. Thus, the signs of alternative hypothesis is denoted by; < or > or ≠.
Now, the question we have is a two tailed test. Thus;
The null hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works correctly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ = 445
The alternative hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works incorrectly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ ≠ 445
He'll get $14.03 because 20.25 is what he gave but it only came up to 6.22 so 20.25-6.22=14.03