Answera dnd Explanation:
A. The incentive conflict in principal-agent relationship as it concerns venture capitalism is conflict between venture capitalists who are the principals and the managers of the business investment who are the agents. The conflict is that venture capitalists are put to increase value of their investment and make profit while salaried managers are only out to feel their pockets through their managerial role in the company as they do not have an interest in the company and are unaffected by the loss or failure of the company. This is known as the principal agent moral hazard issue in venture capitalism 
B. By managers maintaining some ownership in the company, there us reduced conflict as managers now see a reason to make sure company succeeds since they have an interest 
Venture capitalists aim to have a seat in the board to make sure managers do not take bad decisions since they are able to veto such decisions
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: Transformational advertising  
Explanation:
From the given case/scenario, we can state that this approach is an example of Transformational advertising. Transformational advertisement is referred to as or known as advertising which tends to associate experience of consuming advertised brand in association with unique parts of the psychological characteristics that are not typically associated with brand or the experience.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the principal amount at a rate of 4% is 2000
principal amount at a rate of 3.5% is 4000-2000 =2000
Explanation:
We have given total amount borrowed = $4000
Let x amount is borrowed at a rate of 4%
So $4000-x is borrowed at rate of 3.5%
Total interest = $150
We know that simple interest 
So 

0.5 x=1000
x = 2000
So the principal amount at a rate of 4% is 2000
And principal amount at a rate of 3.5% is 4000-2000 =2000
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
I wouldn't.
The business has drawn a rigid line in the sand. It has to maintain its standard. I might try and make a deal with the customer. "Come up with x% for a down payment."
If the score is high (like over 750), I would likely stretch my standard. 750 is a pretty high score and if you have that kind of a number, you know how to pay things back. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
$2,850
Explanation:
Given the following :
Face value of security = $100,000
Carrying value = $95,000
Effective interest rate = 6%
Interest paid semianually = $2500
The effective interest revenue recognized for the six months ended December 31, 2018 is:
IF effective interest rate = 6%
Semiannual interest = 6% / 2 = 3%
Therefore effective interest revenue for six months will be the product of the carrying value and the interest rate within the six months period :
3% = 0.03
0.03 * $95,000 = $2,850