An increase in US. Interest rates relative to German interest rates would likely reduce the u. S. Demand for euros and increase the supply of euros for sale.
<h3>What is the impact of an increase in interest rate on a country's currency?</h3>
When the interest rate of a country's currency increases, the value of that currency increases. As a result, there would be an increase in the demand for that currency relative to other currencies.
When the US interest rates increase relative to that of Germany, the value of the dollar would increase. This would lead to an increase in the demand for the dollar and a decrease in demand for the euros.
To learn more about currencies, please check: brainly.com/question/17180334
Answer:
competition
Explanation:
In simple words, competition refers to the tendency of two or more parties to perform better than one another for the sake of own personal benefits. In business, competition can be done from various perspectives like price or quality.
In the given case, Jeff has been producing at a lower cost but despite of earning high profits he is willing to sell for lower prices with the motive of competing in the market and gaining higher market share.
Answer:
A production possibility frontier (PPF) illustrates the combinations of output of two products that a country can supply using all of their available factor inputs in an efficient way. One way the PPF can shift outwards is if there is an increase in the active labour supply
Answer:
Luca Pacioli
Luca Pacioli, was a Franciscan friar born in Borgo San Sepolcro in what is now Northern Italy in 1446 or 1447.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
