Answer:
d. perceptual expectancy
Explanation:
Sometimes we create some expectations and some headlines that make us sensitive to certain things because of some of our experiences or the tendency that we can get from something we see, hear or read, moreover we change or frame our understanding. All these are about perceptual expectancy. In short it could be explained as a predisposition to perceive things in a certain way, demonstrated by selective retention, perception, and exposure. Perceptual sets occur in all different senses. These sets can also be called standby and can be long-lasting, such as a special sensitivity to hearing their names in a crowded room, or the short-sightedness of short-lived, hungry people. The mental majority is a framework for thinking about a problem and can be formed by habit or desire. Mental clusters can make it easier to solve a class problem, but joining the wrong mental cluster can hinder problem solving and creativity.
Answer:
well divorce is mostly caused with falling out of love or having an affair.
Explanation:
Each branch of government has the ability to restrict powers of the other branches in a system that is known as checks and balances.
Some of these checks and balances include: The president is the commander in chief of the military, but only Congress can fund the military and declare war.
<h3>What is the principle of checks and balances?</h3>
checks and balances, principle of government under which separate branches are empowered to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power.
Checks and balances are applied primarily in constitutional governments.
<h3>Who supported checks and balances?</h3>
Building on the ideas of Polybius, Montesquieu, William Blackstone, John Locke and other philosophers and political scientists over the centuries, the framers of the U.S. Constitution divided the powers and responsibilities of the new federal government among three branches: the legislative branch, the executive branch.
Learn more about checks and balances here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/13750952</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
Argument of silence fallacy
Explanation:
The argument of silence fallacy states that if the person or body remains silent about a particular fact or event then there is nothing that can prove that what another person claim about it is true. For example, in this case: There is no section of the bible that discusses the thoughts of Jesus on homosexuality. For this reason it cannot be supposed that the was for or against it because there is simply no evidence.
