The answer to this question is that Martha can sue the
person on negligent infliction of emotional distress.
<span>Negligent infliction of emotional distress is a claim or a
complaint where the accused or defendant’s negligence caused an emotional
damage or trauma to the complainant. When proven guilty, the defendant may be
liable in paying damages in the account of money.</span>
Answer:
Empathy
Explanation:
Empathy is the capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place oneself in another's position. Definitions of empathy encompass a broad range of emotional states.
Answer:
A) acid rain
Explanation:
Plz mark me as a brainliest
Answer:
The best answer from the options given, to the question: How do polls affect presidential elections, would be: Polls identify the top candidates and the media interviews those candidates.
Explanation:
Polls are a means by which elections can be affected and swayed in favor of a candidate, a political party, or a group, because they tend to show the upward trends, which means, it will display, in a campaign, who is at the top in voters´ intention to vote, and thus, might sway other voters to choose either of those at the top. When a campaign takes place, especially for elections, researchers, and pollers, seek to help the public to make the better choice by finding out who is leading the intention of vote in voters. By doing this, polls may allow the public to know who has a chance of being elected, and thus sway support from the public to one, or another of those candidates. The media, of course, will focus their interviewing efforts on those who stand a chance of being elected. Which is why the answer is the one above.
The answer to this depends on what sources you are using, but some sources state that people identify lies only 55% of the time!
That's very little, considering that 50% is the chance level - this number would be the one used if we could never really use our intuition to guess correctly. For example if we guessed that every second person randomly lies that would give us the "chance level" of 50 %. (if exactly half of the people lied).
And in real life, we can tell 55% of the time if people are lying - this means we are slightly better than chance.
We can conclude from this that we should never trust our intuition about whether people lie or not!
