<span><span>Words used: prediction, connotation, primary source, personification and chronological</span>
A Story about history, and how it affected us….Before 2012, many people believed that the year 2012 was going to be the end of the world. This prediction was based off of the Mayan Calendar, a primary source of its own, made at ~August 11, 3114 BC. Why is this a primary source? Because the Mayans themselves made the calendar, and based everything off of it. However, rest assure, because the world didn’t end yet. (obviously, because its like what 2017 right now [delete this ()]). Many people believed this to be true, and thousands of people rushed to get ready for this ‘end of the world’. They bought food and water in large quantities (and with their life savings) and waited out in underground shelters. The connotation of the phrase “end of the world” scares many. They never want to think of what or where the world is going, and the end of the world. Instead, they look towards the past, and try to learn lessons from the past so that they do not make the same mistakes today, because if the same mistakes happen today, well, you never know where the world will lead to tomorrow. How do they look towards the past? Well, they do NOT take bits and pieces from different timezones randomly. Instead, researchers try to find history that actually has an effect on today or tomorrow. Take for example, the world wars. People go in chronological order from even before the start of the war to a little after it, to learn of the reasons the war started, what happened during the war, and the consequences of fighting the war, and how it affects people. After that, many people would write nonfiction and fictional stories about it, sometimes adding personification to animals that “viewed” the battle while it was going on. An example of this, is “War Horse”, by Michael Morpurgo, in which a horse by the name of Joey, is given a personification, and tells us of an experience a horse had in real-life history (from a farm animal to a animal that survived WW1). With all of this information that is given to us from history, both the problems, and the resolution, it is up to us to learn what is best for our current situation, and to not make the same mistakes again. <span>
</span></span>
Answer:
b. Try not to argue with her or be defensive.
c. When talking with her, use clarifying statements to show her you understand the problem.
d. Don't dismiss what she says the problem might be.
Explanation:
In facing or relating with a difficult client as a customer relation officer, one of the basic things to do is to avoid arguing with her or to be defensive. You simply avoid anything that will lead to argument, politely and calmly make your point and pass it across.
The next thing needed to be done is to ensure you clarify her properly, leave no room for doubt from her concerning your knowledge on the product.
Finally, dont overlook her complaint on what the problem is, show empathy, listen through and offer your best solution.
Answer:
1. True
Proteins are frequently called the building blocks of life because they are found everywhere: in our cells, bones, muscles, blood, hormones, enzymes and more. It is thanks to proteins that our body has any sort of structure to it.
2.False
Tissues are groups of similar cells that have a common function. An organ is a structure that is composed of at least two or more tissue types and performs a specific set of functions for the body. Many organs working together to accomplish a common purpose is called an organ system.
3. False
Prokaryotes are unicellular organisms that lack organelles or other internal membrane-bound structures. Therefore, they do not have a nucleus, but, instead, generally have a single chromosome: a piece of circular, double-stranded DNA located in an area of the cell called the nucleoid.
4. False
False, blood cells don't have a rigid cell wall. Plants and Bacteria have rigid cell walls, but not blood cells!
The Jordan River originates near the borders of three countries, Israel, Lebanon, and Syria, with most of the water derived from the Anti-Lebanon Mountains and Mount Hermon to the north and east.
Answer:
The Court decided that as long as the States kept the racially separate facilities equal, then they weren't violating the Constitution.
Explanation:
The Court saw it as follows:
If racially segregated facilities were equal in quality then no harm was being done. As they thought, segregation was NOT discrimination.
