Apparently Sumerian society was thought to be comprised of four social classes: Nobles, commoners, clients and slaves. The Nobles, who were at the top of Sumerian society, consisted of priests, warriors, and of course, the ruling family. Commoners were your average citizen of Sumer at the time. They were the farmers, and craftsmen, and blacksmiths (very, very crude form of blacksmithing). Clients and slaves were the lowest. The slaves had no rights whatsoever. Clients, however could do more and even buy their freedom.
This affected society by trying to create a perfect utopia it caused jealousy towards the higher class and bitterness to others, causing many revolts and outbreaks. The fact the laws were quiet strict, helped fuel that anger and hatred.
"Diversity, Oppression, and Change" is a social work released by Flavio Marsiglia & Stephen Kulis around 2015; to analyze the diversity issues, achieve positive change, break down the picture of oppression and privilege and help understanding the dynamics of oppression certain social groups have experienced, and therefore attain an unbiased and equitable society. (<em>true</em>)
Answer:
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
In research, the term plagiarism refers to the fact of taking someone else's ideas or concepts and use them as if they were one's own. In other words, when writing a paper, we use someone else's work and we don't quote the original authors and it seems as if the words were ours.
In this example, <u>the student quoted the original author of the paper and used one of his quotes in his work but he did give the author credit and he didn't make it seem as if the words were the student's own words. </u>Therefore, this doesn't classify as plagiarism.
Answer: Miranda Verses Arizona was a landmark case in US Supreme Court.
Explanation:
This case presented the fifth amendment of US constitution, which states that the suspect or culprit has own rights to be presented himself or herself in court of law and deeds of self incrimination will not be accepted. According to this amendment the constitution restricts the interrogation related to police custody to be presented as evidence. As the police may manipulate the facts and may try to threatened the suspect for conviction. It also suggests that the suspect also has a right to discuss about the case with the attorney during and before the trial,
