Answer:
i cant awnser it when ist sideways
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Part C: Of the following choices, which equation is the best fit line for the data
As we can see from the data, the population size are decreased year by year, so the slope of the line of best fit must be a negative number.
So we have: C and D left.
Let x = 0, year 2005, the population size is 296 around 320, hence, we choose D.
D f(x) = -34x + 320
Part D: What is the predicted population size for the year 2010? How does that compare to the real data? Round to the nearest million.
year 2010, x =5 so let substitute x =5 into f(x) = -34x + 320
<=> f(x) = -34*5 + 320
= 150 mil
The result is smaller than the real data, (201-150 = 51 mil)
Part E: In what year is the population predicted to go extinct
the population predicted to go extinct when f(x)= 0
<=> -34x + 320 = 0
<=> x ≈ 9.4
So after 10 years, the the population predicted to go extinct
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
the other answers are totally absurd.
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162
Step-by-step explanation:
step by step explanation
Answer:
CR = 17 ; PR = 30
Step-by-step explanation:
From the problem hypothesis we know that CD⊥PR or CQ⊥PR(perpendicular) and ∡PCQ ≡∡RCQ (bisector)
so ∡PCQ≡∡RCQ
[CQ]≡[CQ] (common side)
CQ⊥PR
--------------------------------------------
⇒(cathetus - angle case of congruence)⇒ ΔPQC≡ΔRQC so [PQ]≡[QR] (=15) // PR = PQ+QR ⇒ PR=30
from this congruence ⇒ΔPRC = isosceles so PC=CR=17
Hint: in any triangle is bisector of an angle it is perpendicular on the opposite side then triangle is isosceles.