The answer is B) because your not using any criminal code or doing anything wrong when it's the other persons fault it doesn't have anything to do with trying to address public safety so yeah its B). Process of elimination! Hope I helped!
There are still many Spanish speaking people there. Not only that, there are also full Hispanics there.
Answer:
1. It allows us to support one another, interact, share experiences and our modern life struggles. Having this open bond with others is what builds valuable relationships, and gives us a deeper sense of belonging. Communities are also rich in resources. Your strengths may be someone else's weaknesses and vice versa.
2. *get involved as a volunteer
*support local business'
*pick up litter
(extra) *keeping socially distanced
3. Education- this can benefit everyone. Getting an education can get you a good and better future
Military- Those brave soldiers fight and loose their lives to save us and their country. If we didn't have our military we'd be damaged as a society.
Emergency Services- come on- we all know what they do for us! They save lives! They help us in our time of need and death-
4. well the country would look great if it had it's teachers, police officers, firemen, and etc in hand, but in these times- it's pretty much chaos with school being online- or being in a hybrid process, with police being kicked around and banned from states, with fires that are too hard too put out with the lack of men- it's horrible without those resources
Explanation:
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
