Answer:
The inequality which represents the graph is y ≤ -2x + 1 ⇒ A
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the question you must know some facts about inequalities
- If the sign of inequality is ≥ or ≤, then it represents graphically by a solid line
- If the sign of inequality is > or <, then it represents graphically by a dashed line
- If the sign of inequality is > or ≥, then the area of the solutions should be over the line
- If the sign of inequality is < or ≤, then the area of the solutions should be below the line
Let us study the graph and find the correct answer
∵ The line represented the inequality is solid
∴ The sign of inequality is ≥ or ≤
→ That means the answer is A or B
∵ The shaded area is the area of the solutions of the inequality
∵ The shaded area is below the line
∴ The sign of inequality must be ≤
→ That means the correct answer is A
∴ The inequality which represents the graph is y ≤ -2x + 1
Your answer would be the last option, c = √(E/m).
We can see this when we rearrange the equation, as:
E = mc²
÷ m
E/m = c²
√
√(E/m) = c
So you got all the steps in rearranging correct :)
I hope this helps!
Answer:
-4409/100
bcoz there is decimal next to 2 numbers
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
X will equal -7 in this problem
