1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir79 [104]
3 years ago
10

In the state of florida a first conviction for dui can result in your vehicle being fitted with an ignition for up to

Law
1 answer:
____ [38]3 years ago
8 0
The Answer is 6 months
You might be interested in
Based on the 8th amendment, Should the death penalty continue to be a form of punishment in the United States. (Explain) 10 poin
mash [69]
This is only 5 points but... I think that death penalty should continue as a form of punishment because if someone did something horrible (for example killing many people) they should be punished and jail time is not enough. - Brooke
5 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
This type of government is governed by a constitution that places the power in individuals and limits the power of the governmen
Xelga [282]

Answer:

Democracy

A democracy can be defined as a government system with supreme power placed in the hands of the people. It can be traced back to as early as the fifth century B.C. In fact, the word democracy is Greek for “people power”. While most use the United States as an example of a democratic government system, the United States actually has what is called a representative democracy. The difference lies in the method of civilian participation. In a direct democracy, every citizen is given an equal say in the government. In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives who make the law. The difference is significant when put into action. Other examples of democratic states include Aruba, Bulgaria, Canada, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic.

Republic

In a republic government system, the power also rests with the people, as they are in charge of electing or choosing the country’s leader, instead of the leader being appointed or inheriting power. Broadly defined, a republic is a government system without a monarch. A republic may be governed by a group of nobles, as long as there is not a single monarch. Some examples of countries with a republic government system include Argentina, Bolivia, Czech Republic and France.

Explanation: Democratic republic

4 0
3 years ago
Corrections includes three main areas. Which is not one of them?
raketka [301]

Answer: Trial

Explanation:

In criminal justice,it should be noted that correction relates to the people who have been convicted of some crimes. Correction has to do with how such people are treated or punished.

Corrections includes three main areas which are:

• Imprisonment,

• Parole

• Probation

The prison is a typical correctional center. It should be noted that trial is not among the three areas.

6 0
2 years ago
Article 2 of the US Constitution gives the president the power to
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

receive foreign ambassadors and recognize foreign states, as well as the power to make treaties and appoint ambassadors

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One way to avoid carbon monoxide poisoning is to:
    14·2 answers
  • 4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
    7·1 answer
  • What can care providers do to encourage good eating habits
    5·2 answers
  • What in jrotc does Integrity mean?
    9·1 answer
  • Select two reasons for the division of power in a limited government.
    5·2 answers
  • Brainly bug and would allow it because it said it was rude and no that is not the bug
    9·2 answers
  • Explain why it is necessary to place a "2" in front of HCl in the reactants in the chemical equation.
    11·1 answer
  • Cuales son las diferencia entre la declaracion de los derechos humanos de 1789 y la de 1948
    7·1 answer
  • Southbend School District searched for a new learning management system for use in its school district that serves approximately
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think capital punishment should be a viable sentencing option for heinous crimes
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!