Answer:
(A) 18,600 units
(B) 13,821 units
Explanation:
(A) The computation of the equivalent unit for material cost is shown below:
= (Completed and transferred units × completed percentage) + (ending work in progress units × completed percentage)
= (10,500 units × 100%) + (8,100 units × 100%)
= 10,500 units + 8,100 units
= 18,600 units
(B) The computation of the equivalent unit for conversion cost is shown below:
= (Completed and transferred units × completed percentage) + (ending work in progress units × completed percentage)
= (10,500 units × 100%) + (8,100 units × 41%)
= 10,500 units + 3,321 units
= 13,821 units
Answer:
engagement, conversion
Explanation:
Blog refers to a web page run by an individual or small group with the purpose of marketing. Blog targets to the specific audience.
In the given question,
Pedro is using a blog to promote his Afro-Cuban band. His main purpose is to bring people to the online store where they can purchase CDs.
For Pedro, the two most important measurements he tracks are <u>engagement</u> and <u>conversion</u>
Answer:
The head of the company
Explanation:
Chief execute officer of a company is the highest-ranking executive in a company, whose primary responsibilities include making major corporate decisions, managing the overall operations and resources of a company, acting as the main point of communication between the board of directors (the board) and corporate operations, and being the public face of the company.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
