Answer:
$103,400
Explanation:
Does Manuel have any certainties that Nolan will purchase more than 30,000 units during the year? Apparently, according to historic sales, Nolan purchases at least 40,000 units per year, so Manuel should consider that Nolan will again purchase a similar amount this year and therefore, will be entitled to a rebate.
Another issue that must be considered is that 30,000 units / 4 quarters = 7,500 units per quarter, and Nolan clearly purchased more than that.
A rebate is not a discount, it happens when the seller offers a certain amount of goods to a buyer without cost because the buyer purchased more than an specific amount. It is basically an incentive or prize that Manuel gives Nolan for being a good client.
Manuel should recognize $110,000 x (1 - 6%) = $103,400 in revenues
Answer:
The answer is: E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere
Explanation:
Usually the inflation rate in the US and Europe is around 1-3%. In the early 1980's the US inflation rate was above 10% so it was considered huge. But if you consider it against inflation rates in other countries, like Argentina for example, which currently has an annual inflation rate of over 60% then it wasn't that big. During the 1980's many countries suffered from hyperinflation, with monthly inflation rates of over 50%.
So the high inflation rate in the US and Europe wasn't necessarily high for other countries.
Things that would cause prices to drop would be the quantity if there is more of that thing the price drops or the value of that thing just drops.
Answer:
Cafeteria Plan
Explanation:
The cafeteria plan is minimum benefits that the employer have to provide or personally provide to all the employees working in its organization. In some jurisdictions like USA and Europe, the employer has to provide minimum level of facilities and benefits to the employee which inculdes healthcare, pension contributions, etc.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
