Answer:
Researchers surveyed more than 7,500 adults between the ages of 18 to 68 who chose to answer online survey questions at the end of a French television program about the secrets of happiness. People were asked questions to determine their personality through subjects like conscientiousness and emotional stability, and then told the re-answer the questions as if they were 10 years older and younger. The "past" and "future" answers were then compared to people who were in corresponding age groups at the time of taking the survey.
The results showed that people predicted they would change less over 10 years compared to responses from those who looked back 10 years and realized how much they had changed.
For example, 68-year-olds said they had experienced modest personality changes over the past 10 years, while surveyed 58-year-olds predicted very little if any change in the coming decade, even though their own survey results showed they had changed their personality over the past 10 years, according to Science.
Explanation:
Answer:
"Psychomotor Agitation", "Psychomotor Retar dation".
Explanation:
Bethany is most likely experiencing "Psychomotor Agitation" while Bernard is showing signs of "Psychomotor Retar dation".
Psychomotor Agitation is a variety of actions that are done for no actual reason. This is usually caused from anxiety from life problems and shows up in different forms such as pacing, talking fast, biting your nails, tapping your foot, etc.
"Psychomotor Retar dation". is the opposite of Agitation in which the person suffering from this starts to perform regular tasks such as speaking and normal movements in a much slower manner than usual.
**The second one is spaced out because brainly detects it as an inappropriate word**
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>With the enactment in 1903 of the Terrell Election Law, which was amended in 1905-1906, a statewide direct-primary system for all state, district, and county elective offices was established and made mandatory for all parties that had received as many as 100,000 votes in the previous election; the requirement was later ...</span><span>Jun 12, 2010</span>
It breaks apart the Earth's core because you blow up these rocks underneath the Earth. Can cause earthquakes
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
