All categories

3 years ago

Solve this equation 7x+3=5(x-3)+2x

Mathematics

1 answer:

zaharov [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: nonsense

Step-by-step explanation:

7x+3=5(x-3)+2x

7x+3=5x-15+2x

7x+3-5x+15-2x=0

18=0

Non-sense

You might be interested in

HELP PLEASE HELP Please

mylen [45]

The answer is b, 5x^2 + 24x + 1

3 0

3 years ago

Plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

Option A

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of employees exceeded their sales quota = 17

Number of employees met their sales quota = 13

Number of employees didn't exceed their sales quota = 3

Now, we need to find the ratio of the number employees who exceeded their sales quota to the number of employees who didn't exceed their sales quota,

$17:13 + 3\\=17:16$

So, Option 'A' is correct.

Please mark as Brainliest!!

3 0

3 years ago

The sales tax for an item was $28.80 and it cost $320 before tax. What is the answer ?

Lilit [14]

It would cost 348.80

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You work in the HR department at a large franchise. you want to test whether you have set your employee monthly allowances corre

ra1l [238]

Answer:

1) Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 500$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 500$

$z=\frac{640-500}{\frac{150}{\sqrt{40}}}=5.90$

For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.01 of the area in the right and we got:

$z_{crit}= 2.33$

For this case we see that the calculated value is higher than the critical value

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enugh evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance level

2) Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>5.90)=1.82x10^{-9}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, same conclusion for part 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1

Data given

$\bar X=640$ represent the sample mean

$\sigma=150$ represent the population standard deviation

$n=40$ sample size

$\mu_o =500$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.01$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

Step1:State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is higher than 500, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 500$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 500$

Step 2: Calculate the statistic

$z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$z=\frac{640-500}{\frac{150}{\sqrt{40}}}=5.90$

Step 3: Calculate the critical value

For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.01 of the area in the right and we got:

$z_{crit}= 2.33$

Step 4: Compare the statistic with the critical value

For this case we see that the calculated value is higher than the critical value

Step 5: Decision

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enugh evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance level

Part 2

P-value

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>5.90)=1.82x10^{-9}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, same conclusion for part 1

7 0

3 years ago

Please please need help with this one having a hard time with it.

laiz [17]

Ummmmmm where’s the pic?

4 0

2 years ago