Answer:
$800
Explanation:
The computation of the tax saving from using LIFO is shown below:
= Cost of goods sold under LIFO × tax rate - Cost of goods sold under FIFO × tax rate
= $10,000 × 40% - $8,000 × 40%
= $4,000 - $3,200
= $800
By applying the above formula, the tax saving resulted from using the LIFO is $800 and the same is to be considered
Answer: D) rising;falling
Explanation:
Two important trends in the labor force participation rates of adults aged 20 and over in the United States since 1948 are the rising labor force participation rate of adult women and the falling labor force participation rate of adult men.
<span>A public debt owed to foreigners can be burdensome because B) payment of interest reduces the volume of goods. This can usually be seen illustrated in the form of a nation lending another nation money. The debt is public because the whole nation takes it on. The lending nation then is lacking in terms of use by the lending nation.</span>
Answer:
Monthly deposit= $840.74
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of periods= 26*12= 312 months
Future Value= $1,500,000
Interste rate= 0.11/12= 0.0092
<u>To calculate the monthly deposit, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (1,500,000*0.0092) / [(1.0092^312) - 1]
A= $840.74
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
