Answer: c. Total Assets/ Equity
Explanation:
To measure the Return on Equity with 3 ratios, the <em>DuPont Analysis</em> can be used. This is a technique of deconstructing the Return on Equity ratio into various constituent ratios so that their effect on Return on Equity is better know.
The basic DuPont Analysis is;
Return on Equity = 
Total Assets/ Equity or the Assets to Shareholder Equity ratio is the answer.
There is some information missing and I looked up it. If the numbers are not exactly the same, you adjust them to your question.
- The cash account for Pala Medical Co. at June 30, 20Y1, indicated a balance of $166,436.
- The bank collected $26,500 on a $25,000 note, including interest of $1,500.
- A check for $4,000 returned with the statement had been incorrectly recorded by Pala Medical Co. as $400. The check was for the payment of an obligation to Skyline Supply Co. for a purchase on account.
-
Bank service charges for June amounted to $55.
Answer:
June 30, 20Y1
Dr Cash 26,500
Cr Notes receivable 25,000
Cr Interest revenue 1,500
Dr Cash 3,600
Cr Accounts receivable 3,600
Dr Bank fees expense 55
Cr Cash 55
If a balance sheet were prepared for Pala Medical Co. on June 30, 20Y1, what amount should be reported as cash?
$166,436 + $26,500 + $3,600 - $55 = $196,481
Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
Not necessary. Every transactions has two parts recorded as a debit and a credit.
If the purchases of US assets (credit to US capital account, broadly include Treasury bonds, businesses and land) are funded by the sales of goods and services (debit to US current account) then it will push the US balance of payments down.
However, if those purchases are funded by the sales of foreign assets to US investors (debit to US broadly defined capital account), then it will not affect the US BOP negatively. It's the cross ownership of international investors in US assets and US investors in international assets.
Answer:
<h2>ProServices Team and Pro Customers</h2>
Assisting the ProServices Team in serving Pro customers in my department. Here I have assumed that my department manages and coordinates the relationship with Pro customers:
A. Pull orders for Pro customers in advance and have them ready to pick-up
B. Call Pro customers to maintain relationships and proactively seek out business
C. Monitor inventory levels to make sure key Pro items are in-stock
D. Price match other retailers to give Pro the best price
E. Identify pro customers and introduce them to the ProServices team.
Explanation:
“Pro” customers are a group of independent contractors, repair remodelers, specialty tradesmen, property management, and facility maintenance professionals who are afflicted to an organization offering ProServices. They are not the end customers. Between my organization and the customers, they are middlemen and women who are organized by my ProServices organization to offer specialty services to the general public in a professional manner that guarantees customer satisfaction and payment to the professionals for services rendered. In doing this, the ProService organization charges the Pro customers a fixed fee, which is deducted from the payments made by the end-customers.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Business implication: if there are no trade barriers, it would enable them get better raw materials for their business and increase customer base
Legal anti trust implication: lobbying is illegal in some countries
2. Business implication: this would attract more manufacturers who were not previously members of the association which would in turn promote the goals of the association in improving trade amongst the manufacturers
Legal anti trust implication: associatio may be exposed to legal examination, example increased regulations
3 business implications:sales territories would invariably create a safe and secure investment for manufacturers such that there is less cost of marketing and campaigning as consumers are guaranteed
Legal implications: this is against anti trust laws and goes against free trade policies and illegal monopoly
4 business implications: boycotting this supplier could create an alternative source of raw materials which wouldn't be as efficient and even cost more
Legal implications: boycotting a large supplier such as this who might have a political backing might bring political retaliations from the supplier's political proxies who might create other regulations in the supplier's favour
