<span>
Which example BEST illustrates that GDP (gross domestic product) is not always a good indicator of economic health? </span><span><span>A)<span>The GDP falls when consumer spending declines.
</span></span><span>B)<span>Money spent repairing hurricane damage helps raise the GDP.
</span></span><span>C)<span>Goods produced for infrastructure projects help raise the GDP.
</span></span><span>D)<span>The GDP falls because scarcity of materials slows the rate of production.</span></span></span>
There is not enough information in this question to answer it. You cannot determine significance with just the alpha value. You need the actual test statistic (p-value) to determine this.
If the p-value is less than the alpha value, you reject the null hypothesis (the there is no difference).
The journal entry for the purchase of the stock for the trading securities portfolio is that Securities account debited and bank account credited.
Given that Slick Rocks management purchased the Sandstone stock for the trading securities portfolio instead of the available-for-sale securities portfolio.
We are required to form the journal entry that are required by the facts presented in the case.
A journal is basically a detailed account which records all the financial transactions of a business to be used for the future reconciling of accounts.
The journal entry will be as under:
Securities account debited and bank account credited. If we know that which security is being purchased then we can name that securities also.
Hence the journal entry for the purchase of the stock for the trading securities portfolio is that Securities account debited and bank account credited.
Learn more about journal at brainly.com/question/14279491
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Postage expense. 1320
freight out. 1140
miscellaneous exp. 150
Cash. 2610
to replenish petty cash account
note that pettty cash is only debited or credited when you are increasing Or decreasing the petty cash fund. This entry appears to be only replenishing the petty cash account.
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>NICK</u> to choose <u>RIGHT</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Nick chooses <u>RIGHT</u> and Rosa chooses <u>RIGHT</u>.
Explanation:
ROSA
left right
4 / 6 /
left 3 4
NICK
right 6 / 7 /
7 6
Rosa does not have a dominant strategy since both expected payoffs are equal:
- if she chooses left, her expected payoff = 3 + 7 = 10
- if she chooses right, her expected payoff = 4 + 6 = 10
Nick has a dominant strategy, if he chooses right, his expected payoff will be higher:
- if he chooses left, his expected payoff = 4 +6 = 10
- if he chooses right, his expected payoff = 6 + 7 = 13
The only possible Nash equilibrium exists if both Rosa and Nick choose right, so that their strategies are the same, resulting in Rosa earning 6 and Nick 7.
