Answer:
While both speeches rely on logical evidence to support their reasons and claims, they differ quite substantially in how they use this evidence. Chamberlain uses logical evidence, pointing to what may happen to the empire if the status quo were to change. He also relies on anecdotal evidence, specifically his personal stories as a soldier, to try to convince his audience that his claims are true. Nehru, on the other hand, uses some logical evidence, but mostly relies on appeals to support his claim. Nehru leans heavily on pathos, or emotional appeals. He talks of a bright future, stirring his audience’s desire for independence. Nehru claims that, through hard work, an independent India could be great for each and every citizen.
Explanation:
Sample Response
e rcerc hi
h56jket7 xy567jvef 678lgbu789. cvbhyuyb<sd4yt67ir89
Answer:
Norman Conquest in the year 1066
Explanation:
The Norman Conquest of Anglo-Saxon England in the year 1066 was the event which completely changed the course of Anglo-Saxon culture, language and arts. Normans were originally Vikings or Norsemen who had settled in present day northern France (Normandy). After the death of Anglo-Saxon King Edward the Confessor, William the the Conqueror (Duke of Normandy) proclaimed himself the rightful heir of the throne, conquered Anglo-Saxon England and was crowned the King on 25th December 1066.
This conquest had many effects on all aspects of Anglo-Saxon culture, history, language, literature, arts, law, etc. It linked England directly with France and continental Europe which before the conquest was more closely linked with Scandinavia. Anglo-Saxon or Old English as an official language of court, law, literature, was replaced by Anglo-Norman. It was only in 13th century that English (now called Middle English) started to challenge Anglo-Norman. But now it was completely changed from Old English (Anglo-Saxon).
