Answer:
Explanation:
The value is 0.0171
In my opinion this should be the answer
Answer:
The reason why the Founding Fathers created a six-year term limit for members of the Senate was:
B. So they could concentrate on the business of the government rather than reelection.
Explanation:
The idea behind the six-year term is stability, as was reasoned by James Madison. Senators could concentrate on doing their jobs instead of worrying about reelection very often. That would give them the chance to do a more stable job. Of course, to prevent Senators from losing touch with people and from becoming a way-too-powerful aristocracy, one-third of the Senators' terms would expire every two years, leaving two-thirds of the members in office.
Well, after supporting the independence of Israel, they (they being the United States) were most concerned that C, not upsetting the oil-producing Arab nations. They wanted to keep good relations with them. At this time, America depended largely on the oil from these countries at this time. I hope this helps! ~Mia
Answer:
The three components of an attitude are cognitive, affective, and behavioral. The cognitive component of an attitude is the knowledge or beliefs concerning the attitudinal object. The affective component of an attitude is the emotional stance toward the object. The behavioral aspect of an attitude includes both the behaviors that are inspired by the attitude and the intended behavior inspired by the attitude.
Explanation:
Answer:
To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.
