The factor that led to shifts in the supreme court decisions over time is that
- The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
<h3>
How the supreme court Justices became less liberal</h3>
The supreme court justices became less liberal due to the fact that a lot of these judges were conservatives.
The conservative judges were the ones that were in favor of keeping the ideals and the traditions that the country was built on.
<u>complete question:</u>
Which of the following factors most likely led to shifts in Supreme Court decision making over time?
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
After 1960, the Supreme Court deferred to the wishes of state and local governments rather than voting to expand the authority of the federal government.
Rather than pass new legislation, Congress was inclined to refer civil rights legislation to the Supreme Court.
Constitutional amendments enabled the Supreme Court to issue more liberal decisions.
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over
Read more on conservatives here:brainly.com/question/8668324
Hello. You did not present the experiment to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is likely that the amount of water presented in the question above is a variable in the experiment. This allows us to consider that if the experiment were carried out with different amounts of water, this experiment would provide inaccurate data and the results would not be considered true, making it impossible for a precise conclusion to be revealed.
This would happen because an experiment must distribute the variables, in all treatments, with the same amount and intensity. Therefore, to promote accurate data, the experiment must use an equal amount of water in all treatments.
Answer:
The New Jersey plan gave Congress the powers to set taxes and regulate trade
The New Jersey Plan gave Congress the power to set taxes, regulate trade, and elect and executive branch made up of more than one person. It also stated that the legislature would be a single house with each state having one vote. A settlement of a dispute by each party giving up some demands.
A major argument against legalizing euthanasia is a concern that it may lead society to condone the killing of those who are not ready to die, creating a slippery slope.
<h3>What is
euthanasia?</h3>
Euthanasia is the practice of ending a patient's life in order to relieve their suffering. Normally, the patient in question would have a serious illness or be in excruciating agony. The Greek words "EU" (good) and "Thanatos" are the origin of the word "euthanasia."
The Christian commandment "Do not kill," respect for life or the sanctity of life, the principle of non-maleficence (do no harm), the Hippocratic Oath, and a few so-called "slippery-slope arguments" are some of the moral grounds against euthanasia that will be covered first.
Legalization has three key advantages:
- Achieving personal autonomy,
- Minimizing unnecessary pain and suffering,
- Giving terminally ill patients psychological confidence.
To know more about euthanasia refer to: brainly.com/question/2940464
#SPJ4
